HP OMEN by HP Laptop PC

Performance Results

Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation 29%
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (9th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 91 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics44.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive82.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Very high background CPU (60%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemHP OMEN by HP Laptop PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8574
Memory10.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200713
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 17 '21 at 11:33
Run Duration161 Seconds
Run User ARE-User
Background CPU 60%

 PC Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i7-9750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
59.2% Above average
Memory 70.7
1-Core 69.7
2-Core 151
58% 97.1 Pts
4-Core 258
8-Core 424
43% 341 Pts
64-Core 576
39% 576 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 59.2%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060 (Mobile)
HP(103C 8574) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 471.96
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
44.5% Average
Lighting 31.7
Reflection 91
Parallax 91.8
26% 71.5 fps
MRender 121
Gravity 75.4
Splatting 75.4
66% 90.5 fps
Poor: 53%
This bench: 44.5%
Great: 81%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB256HAHQ-000H1 256GB
183GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXD70H1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 235 278 290 291 296 289 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
82.1% Excellent
Read 707
Write 276
Mixed 293
SusWrite 280
86% 389 MB/s
4K Read 19.8
4K Write 35.5
4K Mixed 22.6
78% 26 MB/s
DQ Read 329
DQ Write 241
DQ Mixed 272
207% 280 MB/s
Poor: 91%
This bench: 82.1%
Great: 237%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB
511GB free
Firmware: JB0OA3T0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 106 108 106 60 20 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
32.8% Below average
Read 30.2
Write 95.5
Mixed 33.7
SusWrite 84.2
44% 60.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.3
53% 0.33 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 32.8%
Great: 76%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Micron 8ATF1G64HZ-2G6E1 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
73.4% Very good
MC Read 29.3
MC Write 31.1
MC Mixed 22.7
79% 27.7 GB/s
SC Read 10.8
SC Write 19.7
SC Mixed 19.9
48% 16.8 GB/s
Latency 99.8
40% 99.8 ns
Poor: 60%
This bench: 73.4%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

 SkillBench Score 31: 3R 3G 7B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware.

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
31% 17% 76 295 212 144 15.5" 1536 864 LGD05FE
Typical OMEN by HP Laptop PC Builds (Compare 319 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming 55%
Desktop 80%
Workstation 46%

System: HP OMEN by HP Laptop PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 42% - Average Total price: $46
The Best.
Intel Core i5-11600K $260Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-11400F $260Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
Intel Core i7-11700K $350Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $183
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $43Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $68SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $38Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $75SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback