Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (94th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 6 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Memory	3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (67%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Phenom II X4 B97 1,103 User benchmarks, average bench 55% XU1 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	59.9% Above average	Memory 88 1-Core 46.9 2-Core 93.8 51% 76.2 Pts	4-Core 187 8-Core 189 25% 188 Pts	64-Core 190 12% 190 Pts
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 59.9% Great: 60%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Apacer A S350 256GB 39 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 143GB free (System drive) Firmware: AP61 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable		Read 225 Write 119 Mixed 186 39% 177 MB/s	4K Read 22.9 4K Write 63.8 4K Mixed 24.7 100% 37.1 MB/s	DQ Read 111 DQ Write 128 DQ Mixed 109 85% 116 MB/s
Poor: 42% Great: 90%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown ID:80 AD HMT112U6TFR8C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT112U6TFR8C-H9 ID:80 AD HMT112U6TFR8C-H9 36GB 18 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 1333, 1333, 1333, 0 MHz 1024, 1024, 1024, 33792 MB Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	32.1% Below average	MC Read 13.7 MC Write 7.5 MC Mixed 11.3 31% 10.8 GB/s	SC Read 6.7 SC Write 6.1 SC Mixed 8.5 20% 7.1 GB/s	Latency 69.5 58% 69.5 ns
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 32.1% Great: 32%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 47%

Yacht

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

CPU
Phenom II X4 B95AMDBench 53%, 2,408 samples	26x
Athlon II X2 B24AMDBench 42%, 2,045 samples	22x
Athlon II X2 B28AMDBench 45%, 816 samples	13x

GPU
Radeon HD 4200ATIBench 1%, 10,090 samples	44x
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples	10x
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	6x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	3x
SSDSC2BB150G7 150GBIntelBench 52%, 328 samples	2x
MX500 500GBCrucial $54Bench 106%, 237,241 samples	2x

RAM
ID:86 34 SUPERTALENT02 ID:86 34 SUPERTALENT02 41GBUnknownBench 31%, 26 samples	6x
ID:80 CE M378B1G73QH0-CK0 ID:80 CE M378B1G73QH0-CK0 49GBUnknownBench 31%, 14 samples	3x
ID:85 9B CT51264BD160BJ.M8 ID:05 9B CT51264BD16OBJ 44GBUnknownBench 27%, 3 samples	3x

Value: 21% - Poor

Total price: $28

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16