Asus P8H77-M LE

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (13th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 87 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics9.13% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus P8H77-M LE  (all builds)
Memory2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120214
Uptime30.6 Days
Run DateSep 17 '21 at 03:54
Run Duration297 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3450-$59
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
60.2% Good
Memory 77.8
1-Core 84.6
2-Core 115
58% 92.4 Pts
4-Core 239
8-Core 294
34% 267 Pts
64-Core 301
19% 301 Pts
Poor: 55%
This bench: 60.2%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 460 SE
Device(0000 0000) 1GB
CLim: 648 MHz, MLim: 850 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
9.13% Terrible
Lighting 9.7
Reflection 16.2
Parallax 11.3
8% 12.4 fps
MRender 17.4
Gravity 12.3
Splatting 13.1
12% 14.3 fps
Poor: 9%
This bench: 9.13%
Great: 11%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$24
20GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 15.01H15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8 15 25 15 17 11 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
6.5% Terrible
Read 7.5
Write 16.6
Mixed 11.7
SusWrite 15.1
10% 12.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.1
21% 0.17 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 6.5%
Great: 69%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
167GB free
Firmware: JC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 69 66 55 69 70 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
45.1% Average
Read 90.6
Write 91.5
Mixed 56.2
SusWrite 66.4
56% 76.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.8
137% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 45.1%
Great: 68%
SanDisk Ultra USB 3.0 64GB
19GB free, PID 5595
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 15 13 12 14 16 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
9.35% Terrible
Read 25.1
Write 11.7
Mixed 13.7
SusWrite 14.7
20% 16.3 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.6
50% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 9.35%
Great: 40%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL RipjawsX DDR3 1600 C10 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
25.2% Poor
MC Read 8.6
MC Write 8.4
MC Mixed 7.6
23% 8.2 GB/s
SC Read 6.5
SC Write 7
SC Mixed 6.6
19% 6.7 GB/s
Latency 84.7
47% 84.7 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 25.2%
Great: 34%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 10: 0R 2G 4B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
10% 10% 61 42 5 60 23" 1920 1080 SAM0655 SyncMaster
Typical P8H77-M LE Builds (Compare 761 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P8H77-M LE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback