PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
Graphics | 21.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 67.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
Memory | 32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | HP Z840 Workstation (all builds) |
Motherboard | Hewlett-Packard 2129 |
Memory | 27.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20180518 |
Uptime | 1.4 Days |
Run Date | Sep 16 '21 at 21:22 |
Run Duration | 288 Seconds |
Run User | ALB-User |
Background CPU | 2% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2670 v3
CPU0, 2 CPU, 24 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.35 GHz (avg)
|
56.4%
Above average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia Quadro K5000
HP(103C 0965) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 705 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 471.41
|
21.5%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung MZ7PD256HAFV-000H7 256GB
37GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXM05H6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 115 121 120 107 110 MB/s
|
67.7%
Good
|
|||
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
90GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 118 119 120 121 122 MB/s
|
60.9%
Good
|
|||
Seagate ST2000NM0033 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: NS00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 178 181 181 178 182 183 MB/s
|
104%
Outstanding
|
|||
Seagate ST32000542AS 2TB-$100
359GB free
Firmware: CC38
SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 55 57 56 56 56 MB/s
|
33.9%
Below average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung M393A2K40BB1-CRC 2x16GB
2 of 16 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
35.8%
Below average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware
Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
52% | 38% | 42 | 254 | 183 | 60 | 27" | 1920 1080 | NEC695A EA273WMi |
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2680 v41stBench 66%, 1,252 samples | 132x |
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2620 v31stBench 63%, 2,624 samples | 117x |
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2690 v41stBench 72%, 529 samples | 99x |
GPU | |
---|---|
Quadro M4000NvidiaBench 32%, 9,043 samples | 150x |
Quadro K4200Nvidia $820Bench 21%, 7,330 samples | 103x |
Quadro K2200Nvidia $440Bench 16%, 13,860 samples | 94x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 123% - Outstanding | Total price: $90 |