PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
Graphics | 16.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 69.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
Memory | 32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | HP Z240 Tower Workstation (all builds) |
Motherboard | HP 802F |
Memory | 13.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20190424 |
Uptime | 8.8 Days |
Run Date | Sep 16 '21 at 19:02 |
Run Duration | 194 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 47% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Xeon E3-1225 v5
CPU0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
|
76.1%
Very good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia Quadro K2200-$440
HP(103C 1097) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1124 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 471.11
|
16.5%
Very poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Crucial MTFDDAK512TBN-1AR1ZABHA 512GB
182GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPC0014
SusWrite @10s intervals: 248 242 275 260 207 242 MB/s
|
69.8%
Good
|
|||
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$129
766GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 324 325 334 350 337 360 MB/s
|
89.9%
Excellent
|
|||
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52
232GB free
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 323 324 334 337 264 273 MB/s
|
83.2%
Excellent
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung M378A1G43DB0-CPB 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (24th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
70.9%
Very good
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware
Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0% | 0% | 8 | 11 | 8 | 60 | 23.8" | 1280 720 | HPN3499 HP VH240a |
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-6700Intel $180Bench 72%, 282,363 samples | 1,102x |
Core i7-7700Intel $167Bench 76%, 256,717 samples | 347x |
Core i5-6500Intel $67Bench 64%, 241,476 samples | 275x |
GPU | |
---|---|
HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 188,220 samples | 225x |
Quadro K2200Nvidia $440Bench 16%, 13,860 samples | 209x |
Quadro K620Nvidia $170Bench 11%, 16,214 samples | 179x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 82% - Excellent | Total price: $180 |