Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS

Performance Results


Gaming 106% UFO	Desktop 97% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 121% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 99.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	104% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	51.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (all builds)
Memory	27.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20201204
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 16 '21 at 17:57
Run Duration	200 Seconds
Run User	ZAF-User
Background CPU	8%

Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (49^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X-$249 60,132 User benchmarks, average bench 99% AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	99.3% Outstanding	Memory 82.2 1-Core 164 2-Core 294 98% 180 Pts	4-Core 622 8-Core 1,218 109% 920 Pts	64-Core 2,227 138% 2,227 Pts
Poor: 87% ↑ This bench: 99.3% Great: 108%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$400 1,082,454 User benchmarks, average bench 102% EVGA(3842 6583) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 470.05 Performing below potential (71^st percentile) - GPU OC Guide	104% Outstanding	Lighting 130 Reflection 144 Parallax 135 106% 136 fps	MRender 119 Gravity 138 Splatting 123 104% 127 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 104% Great: 110%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel 520 Series 180GB-$132 14,258 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 67GB free (System drive) Firmware: LCSi SusWrite @10s intervals: 142 122 127 121 151 163 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	51.4% Above average	Read 293 Write 204 Mixed 216 SusWrite 138 47% 212 MB/s	4K Read 10.8 4K Write 69 4K Mixed 16.5 74% 32.1 MB/s	DQ Read 248 DQ Write 158 DQ Mixed 192 146% 199 MB/s
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 51.4% Great: 88%
Pc300 NVMe SK hynix 512GB 3,708 User benchmarks, average bench 138% 117GB free Firmware: 20005A00 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 129 168 174 174 161 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	47% Average	Read 700 Write 438 Mixed 82.5 SusWrite 146 75% 342 MB/s	4K Read 12.1 4K Write 3.1 4K Mixed 9.7 32% 8.3 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 47% Great: 172%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9905743-045.A00G 2x16GB 243 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	110% Outstanding	MC Read 65.3 MC Write 34.6 MC Mixed 26.8 121% 42.2 GB/s	SC Read 26.4 SC Write 16.1 SC Mixed 25.8 65% 22.8 GB/s	Latency 76.6 52% 76.6 ns
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 110% Great: 90%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	40	94	9	60	23.1"	1920 1080	GSM59DC 23EN43

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS Builds (Compare 6,828 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 129%

UFO

Desktop 94%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 130%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS - $200

CPU
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD $205Bench 86%, 635,419 samples	1,305x
Ryzen 5 5600XAMD $152Bench 96%, 383,420 samples	869x
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD $202Bench 98%, 128,080 samples	833x

GPU
RTX 3070Nvidia $400Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	570x
RTX 3080Nvidia $625Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	515x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	403x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $90Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	339x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $107Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	271x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	265x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	242x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $56Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	141x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBCorsairBench 93%, 89,024 samples	141x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 98% - Outstanding

Total price: $940

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16