Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 43% Speed boat	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	1.78% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	51.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (81%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-2620M 16,111 User benchmarks, average bench 52% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.45 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	43.3% Average	Memory 68.7 1-Core 51.7 2-Core 75.9 43% 65.4 Pts	4-Core 103 8-Core 123 15% 113 Pts	64-Core 131 8% 131 Pts
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 43.3% Great: 62%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 4000 106 User benchmarks, average bench 2% HP(103C 1618) 2GB Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4229 Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	1.78% Terrible	Lighting 2 Reflection 2.1 Parallax 1.5 2% 1.87 fps	MRender 2.8 Gravity 2.3 Splatting 2.5 2% 2.53 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 1.78% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial MX100 256GB-$116 55,768 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 191GB free (System drive) Firmware: MU01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 161 181 179 175 179 177 MB/s Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	51.8% Above average	Read 181 Write 179 Mixed 167 SusWrite 175 40% 175 MB/s	4K Read 18.8 4K Write 44.3 4K Mixed 24 83% 29 MB/s	DQ Read 172 DQ Write 197 DQ Mixed 161 128% 177 MB/s
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 51.8% Great: 97%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x8GB 236,291 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR3 Performing below expectations (20^th percentile)	44.8% Average	MC Read 15.3 MC Write 17.4 MC Mixed 15.4 46% 16 GB/s	SC Read 11.9 SC Write 12.7 SC Mixed 12.1 35% 12.2 GB/s	Latency 104 38% 104 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 44.8% Great: 97%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 51%

Yacht

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

GPU
Radeon HD 6470MAMDBench 2%, 4,805 samples	117x
HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 110,588 samples	85x
Radeon HD 7400MAMDBench 2%, 4,688 samples	30x

Value: 11% - Very poor

Total price: $32

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16