Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 31% Sail boat	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 26.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	2.25% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	68.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A4-9120 APU (2016 M.SR) 1,643 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Socket FS1r2, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	26.4% Poor	Memory 41.7 1-Core 46.8 2-Core 60.4 31% 49.6 Pts	4-Core 64.8 8-Core 72.8 9% 68.8 Pts	64-Core 75.1 5% 75.1 Pts
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 26.4% Great: 39%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon R3 Graphics 6,360 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Legend(17AA 39F9) 512MB Ram: 512MB, Driver: 20.10.35.02 Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)	2.25% Terrible	Lighting 2.2 Reflection 4.9 Parallax 3.1 2% 3.4 fps	MRender 3.4 Gravity 2.3 Splatting 5.2 3% 3.63 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 2.25% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Adata SU650 240GB-$70 47,016 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 169GB free (System drive) Firmware: V8X01c83 SusWrite @10s intervals: 292 300 302 301 313 308 MB/s Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	68.1% Good	Read 334 Write 312 Mixed 278 SusWrite 303 69% 307 MB/s	4K Read 20.4 4K Write 51.2 4K Mixed 28.7 95% 33.4 MB/s	DQ Read 151 DQ Write 145 DQ Mixed 164 119% 153 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 68.1% Great: 99%
Seagate ST500LM021-1KJ152 500GB 40,079 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 279GB free Firmware: 0003LIM1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 128 128 128 130 132 MB/s Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	75.8% Very good	Read 136 Write 109 Mixed 68 SusWrite 128 81% 110 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0.8 137% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 75.8% Great: 77%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 1x8GB 168,538 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 1 of 1 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 1066 MHz Performing below potential (23^rd percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	24.3% Poor	MC Read 8.9 MC Write 7.8 MC Mixed 9.2 25% 8.63 GB/s	SC Read 6.1 SC Write 6.9 SC Mixed 7.8 20% 6.93 GB/s	Latency 195 20% 195 ns
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 24.3% Great: 67%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 34%

Sail boat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

GPU
Radeon R5 GraphicsAMDBench 3%, 31,419 samples	52x
Radeon R3 GraphicsAMDBench 2%, 6,360 samples	14x
Radeon R4 GraphicsAMDBench 3%, 13,349 samples	8x

Value: 12% - Very poor

Total price: $70

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16