| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (93rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 7 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master! |
| Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent. |
| Graphics | 62.3% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
| Boot Drive | 56.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
| Motherboard | Asrock H310CM-HDV (all builds) |
| Memory | 13.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20190514 |
| Uptime | 0.1 Days |
| Run Date | Sep 16 '21 at 08:34 |
| Run Duration | 152 Seconds |
| Run User | TUR-User |
| Background CPU | 2% |
PC Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5-9400F-$102
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
|
92.9%
Outstanding
|
82% 149 Pts
|
78% 622 Pts
|
47% 762 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super)-$300
CLim: 2250 MHz, MLim: 3425 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 471.96
|
62.3%
Good
|
65% 80.6 fps
|
58% 71.3 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Sandisk PLUS 240GB
51GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF4004RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 288 130 133 141 103 95 MB/s
|
56.2%
Above average
|
66% 299 MB/s
|
82% 28.8 MB/s
|
44% 79.2 MB/s
|
|
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$39
714GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 181 183 179 179 180 179 MB/s
|
103%
Outstanding
|
113% 155 MB/s
|
143% 1.03 MB/s
| |
|
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$39
55GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 201 202 198 200 204 204 MB/s
|
116%
Outstanding
|
124% 170 MB/s
|
144% 1.1 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown TEAMGROUP-UD4-2133 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
|
85.3%
Excellent
|
87% 30.3 GB/s
|
75% 26.1 GB/s
|
61% 65.3 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware
| Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0% | 0% | 0 | 10 | 8 | 60 | 21.5" | 1280 720 | ACR03E1 K222HQL |
Typical H310CM-HDV Builds (Compare 3,791 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asrock H310CM-HDV
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-9400FIntel $102Bench 85%, 299,482 samples | 1,296x |
| Core i3-9100FIntel $88Bench 80%, 34,310 samples | 1,134x |
| Core i5-8400Intel $131Bench 82%, 312,220 samples | 135x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples | 563x |
| GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $233Bench 71%, 428,800 samples | 308x |
| RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples | 266x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 78% - Very good | Total price: $285 |