| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
| Graphics | 36.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Very high background CPU (45%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asrock B85M Pro4 (all builds) |
| Memory | 0.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20150727 |
| Uptime | 8.1 Days |
| Run Date | Sep 16 '21 at 05:43 |
| Run Duration | 126 Seconds |
| Run User | KOR-User |
| Background CPU | 45% |
PC Performing as expected (60th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
71.4%
Very good
|
70% 122 Pts
|
53% 423 Pts
|
33% 531 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
36.4%
Below average
|
39% 45.8 fps
|
32% 39.1 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
67% 304 MB/s
|
92% 28.5 MB/s
|
38% 45.1 MB/s
| |
|
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC25
SusWrite @10s intervals: 176 178 178 175 180 179 MB/s
|
98.3%
Outstanding
|
100% 137 MB/s
|
132% 0.97 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung M378B1G73EB0-CK0 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
|
28.9%
Poor
|
27% 9.37 GB/s
|
25% 8.67 GB/s
|
49% 82.1 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical B85M Pro4 Builds (Compare 1,251 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asrock B85M Pro4 - $150
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-4460Intel $194Bench 62%, 245,403 samples | 189x |
| Core i7-4790Intel $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples | 139x |
| Core i5-4690Intel $52Bench 67%, 73,695 samples | 133x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples | 114x |
| GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples | 86x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 83x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 62% - Good | Total price: $387 |