Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 24%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	0.96% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (45^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Atom x5-Z8350 9,056 User benchmarks, average bench 21% CHV, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.45 GHz, turbo 1.7 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	24% Poor	Memory 36.8 1-Core 19.1 2-Core 35.6 21% 30.5 Pts	4-Core 66.6 8-Core 67 9% 66.8 Pts	64-Core 66.1 4% 66.1 Pts
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 24% Great: 28%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 16,763 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Intel(8086 7270) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4331 Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	0.96% Terrible	Lighting 1 Reflection 0.8 Parallax 1.7 1% 1.17 fps	MRender 1.6 Gravity 1.1 Splatting 1.8 1% 1.5 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 0.96% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 64GB 7,850 User benchmarks, average bench 12% 32GB free, PID 5567 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 13 7.7 15 16 15 MB/s Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	11.8% Very poor	Read 17.4 Write 10.3 Mixed 18.7 SusWrite 14.3 20% 15.2 MB/s	4K Read 4 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 2.7 164% 2.8 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 11.8% Great: 18%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 1x2GB 99,586 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 1 of 1 slots used 2GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1066 MHz Performing below potential (34^th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	14.8% Very poor	MC Read 5 MC Write 5.6 MC Mixed 5.2 15% 5.27 GB/s	SC Read 2.2 SC Write 4.6 SC Mixed 3.1 9% 3.3 GB/s	Latency 218 18% 218 ns
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 14.8% Great: 26%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
4%	10%	21	5	1	60	13.9"	1366 768	MS_0003

History: Score 3: 0R 1G 0B | Score 4: 0R 1G 1B

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16