Toshiba Qosmio X75-A

Performance Results


Gaming 8% Tree trunk	Desktop 59% Gunboat	Workstation 8% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (17th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 83 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 51.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	6.3% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	50.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Toshiba Qosmio X75-A (all builds)
Motherboard	Type2 Type2 - Board Product Name1
Memory	7.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140418
Uptime	3.7 Days
Run Date	Sep 15 '21 at 23:39
Run Duration	163 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4700MQ-$209 69,603 User benchmarks, average bench 59% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 1.5 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	51.2% Above average	Memory 88.7 1-Core 88.1 2-Core 107 62% 94.5 Pts	4-Core 76.4 8-Core 343 22% 210 Pts	64-Core 350 22% 350 Pts
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 51.2% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 770M 6,357 User benchmarks, average bench 16% Toshiba(1179 FA77) 3GB Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 25.21.14.2531 Relative performance (0^th percentile)	6.3% Terrible	Lighting 7.2 Reflection 4.5 Parallax 10.1 6% 7.27 fps	MRender 5.3 Gravity 11.5 Splatting 9 7% 8.6 fps
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 6.3% Great: 17%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Toshiba HG5d Q Series mSATA 256GB-$167 1,242 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 40GB free (System drive) Firmware: HTTAN101 SusWrite @10s intervals: 142 76 91 88 83 71 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	50.6% Above average	Read 455 Write 178 Mixed 371 SusWrite 91.9 61% 274 MB/s	4K Read 21.4 4K Write 25.2 4K Mixed 19.8 71% 22.1 MB/s	DQ Read 155 DQ Write 62.1 DQ Mixed 44 50% 87.1 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 50.6% Great: 92%
Toshiba MQ01ABD100 1TB-$58 322,803 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 885GB free Firmware: AX0A4M SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 18 17 17 22 21 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 23% Great: 62%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5173QH0-YK0 4x4GB 1,523 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	48.6% Average	MC Read 20 MC Write 18.3 MC Mixed 15 51% 17.8 GB/s	SC Read 5.4 SC Write 4.8 SC Mixed 16.2 25% 8.8 GB/s	Latency 68.9 58% 68.9 ns
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 48.6% Great: 58%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	9	7	40	17.2"	1280 720	AUO209D

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Qosmio X75-A Builds (Compare 77 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 56%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

System: Toshiba Qosmio X75-A

CPU
Core i7-4700MQIntel $209Bench 59%, 69,603 samples	72x
Core i7-4910MQIntel $110Bench 67%, 6,703 samples	3x
Core i7-4702MQIntelBench 61%, 21,618 samples	1x

GPU
HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 258,091 samples	47x
GTX 770MNvidiaBench 16%, 6,357 samples	30x

SSD
HG5d Q Series mSATA 256GBToshiba $167Bench 71%, 1,242 samples	29x
Solid State Disk 1TBSpccBench 79%, 17,192 samples	3x
M4 256GBCrucial $218Bench 61%, 17,938 samples	2x

RAM
M471B5173BH0-YK0 4x4GBSamsungBench 54%, 1,045 samples	15x
M471B5173QH0-YK0 4x4GBSamsungBench 53%, 1,523 samples	8x
M471B5173DB0-YK0 4x4GBSamsungBench 53%, 1,054 samples	5x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 38% - Below average

Total price: $376

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $48	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16