Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (12th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 88 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 21.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Boot Drive	34.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 4GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	HP Compaq dc5700 Small Form Factor (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 0A60h
Memory	2.2 GB free of 4.00098 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20070413
Uptime	2 Days
Run Date	Sep 15 '21 at 22:00
Run Duration	142 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	100%

PC Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium D 3.40GHz 3,806 User benchmarks, average bench 32% XU1 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	21.5% Poor	Memory 33.9 1-Core 28.4 2-Core 42.9 23% 35.1 Pts	4-Core 54.6 8-Core 48.6 7% 51.6 Pts	64-Core 54.7 3% 54.7 Pts
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 21.5% Great: 38%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial BX200 240GB-$36 36,559 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 194GB free (System drive) Firmware: MU02.6 SusWrite @10s intervals: 160 66 62 44 45 37 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	34.2% Below average	Read 196 Write 79.3 Mixed 199 SusWrite 69 30% 136 MB/s	4K Read 18.7 4K Write 30.8 4K Mixed 17 66% 22.2 MB/s	DQ Read 28.8 DQ Write 55.5 DQ Mixed 42.5 32% 42.3 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 34.2% Great: 91%
Generic Flash Disk 2GB 6,669 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 0GB free, PID 6387 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 9.4 Write 3.2 Mixed 3.7 6% 5.43 MB/s	4K Read 3.3 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 12% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 2% Great: 8%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 37GB 3,950 User benchmarks, average bench 15% null MHz 1024, 1024, 1024, 1024, 33792 MB Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	10.7% Very poor	MC Read 4 MC Write 3 MC Mixed 3.4 10% 3.47 GB/s	SC Read 3.6 SC Write 3.3 SC Mixed 3 9% 3.3 GB/s	Latency 233 17% 233 ns
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 10.7% Great: 22%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16