Asus H110M-CS

Performance Results


Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 65% Battle cruiser	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	3.43% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	50% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus H110M-CS (all builds)
Memory	1 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170705
Uptime	1.1 Days
Run Date	Sep 15 '21 at 20:24
Run Duration	241 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	19%

PC Performing as expected (57^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-7100-$70 79,299 User benchmarks, average bench 57% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	66.8% Good	Memory 89.4 1-Core 96.7 2-Core 182 72% 123 Pts	4-Core 251 8-Core 293 35% 272 Pts	64-Core 307 19% 307 Pts
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 66.8% Great: 69%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710 187,161 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Zotac(19DA 7326) 2GB CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 471.96 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	3.43% Terrible	Lighting 4.1 Reflection 4.1 Parallax 4.3 3% 4.17 fps	MRender 3.9 Gravity 4 Splatting 5 4% 4.3 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.43% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$32 166,392 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 25GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFK71E0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 110 53 7.2 21 3.1 MB/s Performing below potential (22^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	50% Average	Read 158 Write 102 Mixed 259 SusWrite 42.3 32% 140 MB/s	4K Read 24.8 4K Write 80.2 4K Mixed 18.7 104% 41.2 MB/s	DQ Read 162 DQ Write 311 DQ Mixed 137 132% 203 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 50% Great: 85%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$23 574,344 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 178GB free Firmware: KC48 SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 88 88 88 89 87 MB/s Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	49.9% Average	Read 86.3 Write 81 Mixed 53 SusWrite 87.7 57% 77 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 0.7 122% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 49.9% Great: 88%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378A5244CB0-CRC 1x4GB 4,338 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 1 of 4 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	41.3% Average	MC Read 15.6 MC Write 13.7 MC Mixed 11.4 39% 13.6 GB/s	SC Read 13.2 SC Write 14.3 SC Mixed 12.4 38% 13.3 GB/s	Latency 68 59% 68 ns
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 41.3% Great: 42%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 19: 2R 3G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
19%	11%	46	69	48	60	21.5"	1536 864	SAM0D1A S22F350

History: Score 1: 0R 0G 1B | Score 19: 2R 3G 0B

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H110M-CS Builds (Compare 895 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 10%

Tree trunk

Desktop 72%

Battleship

Workstation 8%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H110M-CS

CPU
Core i5-7400Intel $110Bench 64%, 234,266 samples	245x
Core i3-7100Intel $70Bench 57%, 79,299 samples	145x
Core i3-6098PIntelBench 62%, 6,133 samples	90x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	127x
HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 153,031 samples	116x
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	106x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	57x
Green 240GB (2018)WD $42Bench 45%, 156,194 samples	39x
BX500 240GBCrucial $29Bench 56%, 142,801 samples	33x

RAM
1x4GBAdataBench 31%, 5,816 samples	34x
1x8GBAdataBench 41%, 25,310 samples	27x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C16 2x8GBCorsairBench 75%, 46,470 samples	20x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 84% - Excellent

Total price: $197

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16