Default string

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics37.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive38.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemDefault string  (all builds)
MotherboardINTEL X99
Memory11 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210115
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateSep 15 '21 at 15:56
Run Duration240 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU 23%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2630L v3
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
60.5% Good
Memory 77.4
1-Core 52.8
2-Core 135
53% 88.5 Pts
4-Core 236
8-Core 409
39% 323 Pts
64-Core 632
39% 632 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 60.5%
Great: 75%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130
Sapphire(1DA2 E343) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1300 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 21.8.2
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
37.1% Below average
Lighting 42.8
Reflection 60
Parallax 66.3
35% 56.4 fps
MRender 60
Gravity 50.5
Splatting 44.3
41% 51.6 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 37.1%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD 128GB 128GB
70GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R0522A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 196 48 39 38 16 15 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
38.5% Below average
Read 396
Write 131
Mixed 284
SusWrite 58.7
48% 218 MB/s
4K Read 25
4K Write 25.5
4K Mixed 0.7
52% 17.1 MB/s
DQ Read 18.5
DQ Write 214
DQ Mixed 24.7
46% 85.7 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 38.5%
Great: 84%
Seagate ST3250820AS 250GB-$60
101GB free
Firmware: 3.AAC
SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 60 59 58 59 60 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
35.1% Below average
Read 63
Write 40.9
Mixed 33.3
SusWrite 59
36% 49 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.9
155% 1 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 35.1%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown Atermiter 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 1866 MHz
Performing below potential (50th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
58.3% Above average
MC Read 26.3
MC Write 19.4
MC Mixed 18.8
61% 21.5 GB/s
SC Read 12
SC Write 13.2
SC Mixed 14.9
38% 13.4 GB/s
Latency 85.6
47% 85.6 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 58.3%
Great: 70%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 39: 4R 5G 4B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
39% 38% 34 318 241 60 65" 1280 720 PHL04C3 Philips FTV
History: Score 25: 4R 1G 2B | Score 39: 4R 5G 4B
Typical string Builds (Compare 14,514 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

System: Default string

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $87
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback