Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (47^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3 M 350-$199 14,351 User benchmarks, average bench 38% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.25 GHz, turbo 2.25 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	44.1% Average	Memory 64.3 1-Core 56.8 2-Core 100 46% 73.8 Pts	4-Core 140 8-Core 140 19% 140 Pts	64-Core 140 9% 140 Pts
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 44.1% Great: 44%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
WD Blue 2.5" 160GB (2009)-$23 13,176 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 19GB free (System drive) Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 17 23 23 16 21 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	8.44% Terrible	Read 9.2 Write 17.4 Mixed 11.5 SusWrite 20.1 11% 14.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.1 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0.2 36% 0.27 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 8.44% Great: 36%
Verbatim STORE N GO 4GB 2,873 User benchmarks, average bench 4% 0GB free, PID 0304 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.9 4.8 5.1 4.7 5 5.1 MB/s Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)	4.36% Terrible	Read 15.7 Write 3.7 Mixed 4.2 SusWrite 4.9 8% 7.12 MB/s	4K Read 4.3 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 16% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 4.36% Great: 6%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown HMT325S6BFR8C-H9 80AD HMT425S6AFR6A-PB 4GB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 1067, 1067 MHz 2048, 2048 MB Performing below potential (20^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	22.9% Poor	MC Read 7.5 MC Write 6.6 MC Mixed 9.1 22% 7.73 GB/s	SC Read 6.5 SC Write 5.3 SC Mixed 6.6 18% 6.13 GB/s	Latency 116 35% 116 ns
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 22.9% Great: 48%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 3%

Tree trunk

Desktop 41%

Speed boat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

GPU
GeForce GT 720NvidiaBench 4%, 15,510 samples	2x
HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 99,513 samples	2x

SSD
850 Evo 120GBSamsung $80Bench 96%, 69,224 samples	2x

RAM
M471B5773CHS-CH9 2x2GBSamsungBench 29%, 8,570 samples	2x
M471B5773DH0-CH9 2x2GBSamsungBench 37%, 7,983 samples	1x
HMT351S6BFR8C-H9 1x4GBHynixBench 24%, 8,698 samples	1x

Value: 33% - Below average

Total price: $279

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16