Lenovo 3209CTO

Performance Results


Gaming 8% Tree trunk	Desktop 67% Battle cruiser	Workstation 8% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	3.08% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	45.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

System	Lenovo 3209CTO (all builds)
Motherboard	LENOVO MAHOBAY
Memory	13 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20181211
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Sep 15 '21 at 12:32
Run Duration	187 Seconds
Run User	IDN-User
Background CPU	9%

PC Performing as expected (55^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3570 104,858 User benchmarks, average bench 65% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	73.3% Very good	Memory 82.2 1-Core 101 2-Core 200 73% 128 Pts	4-Core 374 8-Core 366 50% 370 Pts	64-Core 387 24% 387 Pts
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 73.3% Great: 75%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 720 15,510 User benchmarks, average bench 4% Device(1642 3E56) 2GB CLim: 797 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 471.68 Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	3.08% Terrible	Lighting 3.7 Reflection 4.1 Parallax 3.9 3% 3.9 fps	MRender 4.1 Gravity 3.3 Splatting 4.2 3% 3.87 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.08% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
RX7 120GB 120GB 64 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 72GB free (System drive) Firmware: FW200326 SusWrite @10s intervals: 51 34 120 370 179 42 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	45.5% Average	Read 443 Write 343 Mixed 33.2 SusWrite 133 52% 238 MB/s	4K Read 29.4 4K Write 12.5 4K Mixed 6.6 60% 16.2 MB/s	DQ Read 114 DQ Write 16.9 DQ Mixed 15.8 24% 48.7 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 45.5% Great: 77%
WD WD10EURX 1TB-$25 53,598 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 819GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 125 125 123 127 126 MB/s Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	73.1% Very good	Read 129 Write 78.9 Mixed 72.7 SusWrite 125 75% 102 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 0.9 182% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 73.1% Great: 87%
WD Elements 25A2 750GB 1,458 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 106GB free, PID 25a2 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 94 94 92 93 94 MB/s Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	35.7% Below average	Read 66.4 Write 66.9 Mixed 42.7 SusWrite 93.4 93% 67.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.9 94% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 35.7% Great: 46%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT451U6MFR8C-PB 2x8GB 50 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	56.5% Above average	MC Read 20.7 MC Write 21 MC Mixed 17.4 56% 19.7 GB/s	SC Read 16.7 SC Write 17.2 SC Mixed 17.4 49% 17.1 GB/s	Latency 76.6 52% 76.6 ns
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 56.5% Great: 68%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 29: 4R 2G 3B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
29%	9%	95	48	37	60	23.5"	1920 1080	SAM0B45 S24D300

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 3209CTO Builds (Compare 16 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 62%

Destroyer

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 3209CTO

CPU
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	7x
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	5x
Core i5-3570IntelBench 65%, 104,858 samples	2x

GPU
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	3x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	3x
HD 4000 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 52,547 samples	2x

SSD
120GB 120GBRX7Bench 58%, 64 samples	2x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	2x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	1x

RAM
99P5474-013.A00LF 99P5474-014.A00LF KP4T2F-MIN 99P5471-018.A00LF 16GBKingstonBench 44%, 2 samples	2x
K1N7HK-ELC ACR16D3LFU1KBG/2G K1N7HK-ELC ACR16D3LFU1KBG/2G 8GBKingstonBench 46%, 2 samples	2x
RMR5040ED58E9W1600 2x4GBRamaxelBench 54%, 1,811 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 68% - Good

Total price: $297

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16