PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
Graphics | 45.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 35.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asus P8Z68-V PRO GEN3 (all builds) |
Memory | 3.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20111116 |
Uptime | 0.6 Days |
Run Date | Sep 15 '21 at 10:34 |
Run Duration | 282 Seconds |
Run User | NLD-User |
Background CPU | 14% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5-2500K-$246
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
|
76%
Very good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
Nvidia(10DE 1131) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1506 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 466.11
Performing below potential (27th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
45.8%
Average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
OCZ Agility 3 120GB-$102
13GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 63 58 53 50 47 MB/s
|
35.3%
Below average
|
|||
WD Green 1TB (2011)-$109
222GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 80 80 78 79 80 MB/s
|
43.3%
Average
|
|||
Samsung SP2004C 200GB-$46
27GB free
Firmware: VM100-33
SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 38 38 37 37 38 MB/s
|
20.4%
Poor
|
|||
Hitachi HDT725050VLA360 500GB-$159
49GB free
Firmware: V56O
SusWrite @10s intervals: 46 47 45 45 45 45 MB/s
|
25.3%
Poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Corsair Vengeance LP DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
|
53.1%
Above average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware
Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
25% | 19% | 48 | 292 | 212 | 60 | 23" | 1920 1080 | HWP2821 HP 2309 |
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-2600KIntel $319Bench 71%, 147,533 samples | 434x |
Core i5-2500KIntel $246Bench 66%, 143,007 samples | 318x |
Core i7-2700KIntel $89Bench 73%, 20,692 samples | 173x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 104x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 93x |
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 83x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 57% - Above average | Total price: $1,018 |