Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 4.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (62%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Packard EASYNOTE_NJ31 (all builds)
Motherboard	Packard SJV40-YK
Memory	2.7 GB free of 4 GB @ 0 GHz
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20091218
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 15 '21 at 10:03
Run Duration	167 Seconds
Run User	ESP-User
Background CPU	62%

PC Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Athlon TF-20 408 User benchmarks, average bench 28% Socket M2/S1G1, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 1 threads Base clock 1.6 GHz Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	4.6% Terrible	Memory 6.33 1-Core 13 2-Core 14.7 7% 11.3 Pts	4-Core 16.6 8-Core 18 2% 17.3 Pts	64-Core 21.4 1% 21.4 Pts
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 4.6% Great: 43%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
WD Blue 2.5" 160GB (2009)-$23 13,176 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 100GB free (System drive) Firmware: 11.01A11 SusWrite @10s intervals: 43 44 47 47 48 23 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	15.8% Very poor	Read 13.3 Write 41.7 Mixed 9.3 SusWrite 41.9 19% 26.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.1 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 0.1 23% 0.2 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 15.8% Great: 36%
General USB Flash Disk 2GB 158 User benchmarks, average bench 3% 0GB free, PID 800a Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 3 3.4 3.4 3.5 3.4 3.3 MB/s Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	2.6% Terrible	Read 13 Write 3 Mixed 3.6 SusWrite 3.3 6% 5.72 MB/s	4K Read 0 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 0% 0 MB/s
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 2.6% Great: 4%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x2GB 446,702 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 2 of 2 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR2 Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	9.68% Terrible	MC Read 3.8 MC Write 3.5 MC Mixed 3.4 10% 3.57 GB/s	SC Read 2.3 SC Write 1.9 SC Mixed 1.9 6% 2.03 GB/s	Latency 439 9% 439 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 9.68% Great: 44%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16