| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
| Graphics | 14.1% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks. |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
| System | Asus K30AD_M31AD_M51AD (all builds) |
| Motherboard | ASUSTeK K30AD_M31AD_M51AD_M32AD |
| Memory | 4.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
| Display | 3840 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20150803 |
| Uptime | 0.2 Days |
| Run Date | Sep 14 '21 at 22:14 |
| Run Duration | 151 Seconds |
| Run User | FRA-User |
| Background CPU | 4% |
PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i3-4150T
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
|
58.2%
Above average
|
63% 105 Pts
|
30% 224 Pts
|
14% 221 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155
Asus(1043 8772) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 471.68
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
14.1%
Very poor
|
0% 35.9 fps
|
41% 51.3 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$40
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: MX4OABS0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 133 97 91 115 122 116 MB/s
|
54%
Above average
|
51% 71.2 MB/s
|
144% 1.13 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung M378B5173DB0-CK0 Micron 8JTF51264AZ-1G6E1 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
|
52.9%
Above average
|
53% 18.6 GB/s
|
45% 15.7 GB/s
|
48% 83.6 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware
| Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0% | 0% | 0 | 9 | 7 | 144 | 48.9" | 1280 720 | SAM0E5E C49HG9x |
Typical K30AD_M31AD_M51AD Builds (Compare 2,164 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
System: Asus K30AD_M31AD_M51AD
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i7-4790Intel $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples | 413x |
| Core i5-4460Intel $194Bench 62%, 245,403 samples | 394x |
| Core i7-4790SIntel $60Bench 72%, 13,224 samples | 350x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 162x |
| GTX 750Nvidia $120Bench 15%, 66,662 samples | 155x |
| HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples | 142x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 71% - Very good | Total price: $324 |