Asus P8H61-M LX3 R2.0

Performance Results


Gaming 10% Tree trunk	Desktop 67% Battle cruiser	Workstation 9% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 72%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	7.76% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	45.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus P8H61-M LX3 R2.0 (all builds)
Memory	6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	Цвета: 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140225
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Sep 14 '21 at 22:08
Run Duration	153 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	5%

PC Performing as expected (57^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2310-$90 15,623 User benchmarks, average bench 65% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	72% Very good	Memory 91 1-Core 75.3 2-Core 162 66% 109 Pts	4-Core 307 8-Core 317 41% 312 Pts	64-Core 312 19% 312 Pts
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 72% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 9800 GTX 3,983 User benchmarks, average bench 8% Zotac(19DA 1056) 512MB Ram: 512MB, Driver: 342.01 Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	7.76% Terrible	Lighting 10.8 Reflection 12.9 Parallax 4.1 9% 9.27 fps	MRender 9.1 Gravity 8.5 Splatting 4.5 6% 7.37 fps
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 7.76% Great: 8%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SA400S37120GB 120GB 204 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 102GB free (System drive) Firmware: 109R10A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 211 204 202 196 200 182 MB/s Performing below potential (10^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	45.8% Average	Read 224 Write 208 Mixed 188 SusWrite 199 46% 205 MB/s	4K Read 26.5 4K Write 40 4K Mixed 12.1 77% 26.2 MB/s	DQ Read 33 DQ Write 77.2 DQ Mixed 14 22% 41.4 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 45.8% Great: 77%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$23 574,344 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 153GB free Firmware: KC45 SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 95 96 95 96 96 MB/s Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	53.2% Above average	Read 90.5 Write 91.6 Mixed 50.3 SusWrite 94.9 60% 81.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 0.7 124% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 53.2% Great: 88%
Verbatim STORE N GO 8GB 7,781 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 4GB free, PID 0302 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.6 13 13 13 11 12 MB/s Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	5.82% Terrible	Read 18 Write 8 Mixed 3 SusWrite 11.7 12% 10.2 MB/s	4K Read 2.8 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 10% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 5.82% Great: 7%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 99U5584-005.A00LF 2x4GB 8,083 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing below potential (33^rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	47.8% Average	MC Read 17.2 MC Write 16.8 MC Mixed 14.8 46% 16.3 GB/s	SC Read 12.1 SC Write 15 SC Mixed 14.3 40% 13.8 GB/s	Latency 65.8 61% 65.8 ns
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 47.8% Great: 59%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P8H61-M LX3 R2.0 Builds (Compare 1,672 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 61%

Destroyer

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P8H61-M LX3 R2.0 - $200

CPU
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	191x
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	177x
Core i5-3330IntelBench 61%, 51,926 samples	167x

GPU
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	235x
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	109x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	105x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	108x
A400 120GBKingston $29Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	77x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	51x

RAM
1x4GBUnknownBench 28%, 154,807 samples	31x
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	27x
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	26x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $525

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16