Asus P9X79 WS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics41.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive103% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus P9X79 WS  (all builds)
Memory25.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180507
Uptime1.6 Days
Run DateSep 14 '21 at 21:45
Run Duration290 Seconds
Run User AUT-User
Background CPU 13%
Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4930K-$100
LGA2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
80% Excellent
Memory 87.4
1-Core 107
2-Core 212
77% 135 Pts
4-Core 392
8-Core 606
62% 499 Pts
64-Core 758
47% 758 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 80%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155
Zotac(19DA 3595) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 471.96
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
41.1% Average
Lighting 50.6
Reflection 54.8
Parallax 50.3
41% 51.9 fps
MRender 61.9
Gravity 47.1
Splatting 44.1
41% 51 fps
Poor: 39%
This bench: 41.1%
Great: 46%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 750GB-$310
570GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 421 410 395 407 408 407 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 462
Write 447
Mixed 347
SusWrite 408
94% 416 MB/s
4K Read 34
4K Write 63.5
4K Mixed 43.6
141% 47 MB/s
DQ Read 380
DQ Write 331
DQ Mixed 236
210% 316 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 103%
Great: 125%
Nvme GIGABYTE GP-ASAC 1TB
567GB free
Firmware: ECFMH2.3 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1304 965 965 982 983 987 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
184% Outstanding
Read 1,437
Write 1,948
Mixed 1,537
SusWrite 1031
336% 1,488 MB/s
4K Read 33.4
4K Write 66.6
4K Mixed 44
142% 48 MB/s
DQ Read 521
DQ Write 347
DQ Mixed 422
318% 430 MB/s
Poor: 142%
This bench: 184%
Great: 254%
Seagate Expansion Desk 5TB
4.5TB free
Firmware: 9401
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 14 14 14 14 14 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
12% Very poor
Read 26.5
Write 24.8
Mixed 21.7
SusWrite 13.9
16% 21.7 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 3.6
4K Mixed 0.8
206% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 12%
Great: 87%
Seagate Expansion Desk 4TB
2TB free
Firmware: 0737
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 14 14 14 14 14 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
11.8% Very poor
Read 26.6
Write 24.7
Mixed 22.1
SusWrite 14
16% 21.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
137% 1 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 11.8%
Great: 97%
WD VelociRaptor 1TB-$268
879GB free
Firmware: 6A00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 179 184 184 179 181 181 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
95.7% Outstanding
Read 152
Write 157
Mixed 105
SusWrite 181
109% 149 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 3.7
4K Mixed 1.5
298% 2.23 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 95.7%
Great: 117%
WD WD1500HLFS-01G6U1 150GB
138GB free
Firmware: 4V01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 88 86 87 89 89 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
52.4% Above average
Read 94.3
Write 93.7
Mixed 52.1
SusWrite 88.1
60% 82.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1
181% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 52.4%
Great: 68%
TrekStor USB-Stick CLICK 16GB
9GB free, PID 0053
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4 7.3 7.4 7.4 7.3 7.3 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
4.67% Terrible
Read 14.2
Write 0.2
Mixed 4.2
SusWrite 6.8
7% 6.35 MB/s
4K Read 4.8
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
18% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 4.67%
Great: 7%
Seagate Backup+ Hub BK 8TB
3TB free, PID ab38
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 134 134 135 133 132 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
55.4% Above average
Read 82
Write 102
Mixed 53.7
SusWrite 132
129% 92.4 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 4.7
4K Mixed 0.6
184% 2.13 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 55.4%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 4x8GB
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
94.6% Outstanding
MC Read 38.2
MC Write 37.3
MC Mixed 35.9
106% 37.1 GB/s
SC Read 15.7
SC Write 14
SC Mixed 12.3
40% 14 GB/s
Latency 70.1
57% 70.1 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 94.6%
Great: 85%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 8 6 60 27" 1280 720 PHL08C5 Philips 272P4
Typical P9X79 WS Builds (Compare 425 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 61%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 54%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asus P9X79 WS - $270

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Excellent Total price: $782
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback