PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 20.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 72.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
Memory | 24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | HP Z640 Workstation (all builds) |
Motherboard | Hewlett-Packard 212A |
Memory | 7.8 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20161214 |
Uptime | 1.4 Days |
Run Date | Sep 14 '21 at 19:42 |
Run Duration | 264 Seconds |
Run User | CAN-User |
Background CPU | 61% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Xeon E5-2620 v4
CPU0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.15 GHz (avg)
|
69.2%
Good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia Quadro M4000
HP(103C 1153) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 772 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 442.50
|
20.9%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 850 Pro 1TB-$210
72GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 321 281 305 299 292 271 MB/s
|
72.8%
Very good
|
|||
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109
92GB free
Firmware: 1B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 359 324 341 347 343 333 MB/s
|
76.7%
Very good
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
92.9%
Outstanding
|
||||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware
Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
28% | 40% | 25 | 110 | 6 | 60 | 24.1" | 1920 1200 | ACR0426 B246WL |
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Xeon E5-2620 v3IntelBench 66%, 6,890 samples | 113x |
Xeon E5-1650 v3IntelBench 77%, 7,962 samples | 100x |
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2620 v31stBench 63%, 2,624 samples | 97x |
GPU | |
---|---|
Quadro K2200Nvidia $440Bench 16%, 13,860 samples | 146x |
Quadro M4000NvidiaBench 32%, 9,043 samples | 115x |
Quadro K4200Nvidia $820Bench 21%, 7,330 samples | 62x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 16% - Very poor | Total price: $509 |