Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 35% Jet ski	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 35.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	1.39% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	67.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Chuwi?innovation?and?technology(shenzhen)co.,ltd GemiBook Pro (all builds)
Motherboard	To To be filled by O.E.M.
Memory	6.6 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	2160 x 1440 - 32 Bit colori
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20210312
Uptime	1.8 Days
Run Date	Sep 14 '21 at 16:35
Run Duration	115 Seconds
Run User	ITA-User
Background CPU	28%

PC Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron J4125 2,594 User benchmarks, average bench 35% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	35.4% Below average	Memory 38.7 1-Core 51.4 2-Core 113 37% 67.6 Pts	4-Core 186 8-Core 187 25% 186 Pts	64-Core 187 12% 187 Pts
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 35.4% Great: 43%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 600 35,976 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Intel(8086 2212) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.9079 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	1.39% Terrible	Lighting 1.4 Reflection 2.3 Parallax 1.6 1% 1.77 fps	MRender 2.7 Gravity 1.5 Splatting 2.6 2% 2.27 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.39% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Netac 256GB 256GB 2,108 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 186GB free (System drive) Firmware: T0910A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 334 341 364 375 379 416 MB/s Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	67.3% Good	Read 464 Write 400 Mixed 77.6 SusWrite 368 73% 327 MB/s	4K Read 16.8 4K Write 62.9 4K Mixed 0.8 60% 26.8 MB/s	DQ Read 180 DQ Write 281 DQ Mixed 1 65% 154 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 67.3% Great: 97%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
ABCD 123456789012345678 4x3GB 488 User benchmarks, average bench 23% 4 of 4 slots used 12GB DIMM LPDDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	27.7% Poor	MC Read 9.9 MC Write 9.9 MC Mixed 12.7 31% 10.8 GB/s	SC Read 2.7 SC Write 4.8 SC Mixed 4.3 11% 3.93 GB/s	Latency 208 19% 208 ns
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 27.7% Great: 28%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 34%

Sail boat

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

CPU
Celeron J4125IntelBench 35%, 2,594 samples	27x
Celeron J4115IntelBench 34%, 544 samples	5x

GPU
UHD Graphics 600IntelBench 1%, 35,976 samples	32x

RAM
123456789012345678 4x3GBABCDBench 23%, 488 samples	32x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16