Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 27.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	1.37% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (51%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

PC Performing as expected (54^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Atom x5-Z8500 821 User benchmarks, average bench 26% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.45 GHz, turbo 2.25 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	27.5% Poor	Memory 40.7 1-Core 17.7 2-Core 42 22% 33.5 Pts	4-Core 84.4 8-Core 85.5 11% 84.9 Pts	64-Core 86.6 5% 86.6 Pts
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 27.5% Great: 31%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 16,763 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Asus(1043 1BDD) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4308 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	1.37% Terrible	Lighting 1.4 Reflection 1.7 Parallax 2.1 1% 1.73 fps	MRender 2.6 Gravity 1.5 Splatting 2.5 2% 2.2 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.37% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
JetFlash Transcend 128GB 439 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 104GB free, PID 1000 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 18 18 18 19 18 MB/s Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)	23.4% Poor	Read 31.8 Write 15 Mixed 28.1 SusWrite 17.5 30% 23.1 MB/s	4K Read 3.6 4K Write 4.6 4K Mixed 3.4 285% 3.87 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 23.4% Great: 77%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4GB 42,830 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 1600, 1600 MHz 2048, 2048 MB Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	25.1% Poor	MC Read 9.3 MC Write 9.5 MC Mixed 10.1 28% 9.63 GB/s	SC Read 3.1 SC Write 4.7 SC Mixed 4 11% 3.93 GB/s	Latency 199 20% 199 ns
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 25.1% Great: 46%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	9	7	60	0"	1280 720	AUO20D4

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16