HP Compaq dc5850 Small Form Factor

Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 40% Jet ski	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	1.69% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	34.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 8GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (32%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	HP Compaq dc5850 Small Form Factor (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 3029h
Memory	4.5 GB free of 8.00098 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20080409
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 13 '21 at 23:49
Run Duration	184 Seconds
Run User	PHL-User
Background CPU	32%

PC Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Processor model unknown 224 User benchmarks, average bench 45% XU1 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 3 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)	41.9% Average	Memory 64.2 1-Core 38.4 2-Core 81.8 39% 61.5 Pts	4-Core 115 8-Core 119 16% 117 Pts	64-Core 118 7% 118 Pts
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 41.9% Great: 52%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 610 62,458 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Nvidia(10DE 0915) 1GB CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 250 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35 Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	1.69% Terrible	Lighting 2.1 Reflection 2.2 Parallax 0.6 2% 1.63 fps	MRender 2.1 Gravity 2.2 Splatting 1.8 2% 2.03 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 1.69% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Ramsta S800 120GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 50GB free (System drive) Firmware: RY28 SusWrite @10s intervals: 135 45 38 41 40 38 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	34.7% Below average	Read 208 Write 26.5 Mixed 198 SusWrite 56 27% 122 MB/s	4K Read 19.4 4K Write 37 4K Mixed 11.9 64% 22.8 MB/s	DQ Read 60.1 DQ Write 121 DQ Mixed 18.6 35% 66.6 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 34.7% Great: 94%
WD Blue 160GB (2007)-$22 56,540 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 149GB free Firmware: 01.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 104 104 104 104 105 MB/s Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	59.6% Above average	Read 103 Write 101 Mixed 60.4 SusWrite 104 68% 92.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 1 177% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 59.6% Great: 59%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 41GB 2,583 User benchmarks, average bench 17% null MHz 2048, 2048, 2048, 2048, 33792 MB Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	23.4% Poor	MC Read 8.8 MC Write 6.5 MC Mixed 8.7 23% 8 GB/s	SC Read 5.5 SC Write 5.8 SC Mixed 6.5 17% 5.93 GB/s	Latency 116 34% 116 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 23.4% Great: 23%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 3: 0R 1G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
3%	11%	9	8	6	60	21.5"	1280 720	DWE0215 21.5 monitor

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Compaq dc5850 Small Form Factor Builds (Compare 37 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 38%

Jet ski

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq dc5850 Small Form Factor

CPU
Athlon Dual Core 5200BAMDBench 38%, 321 samples	8x
Athlon Dual Core 5000BAMDBench 38%, 530 samples	6x
Athlon Dual Core 4450BAMD $21Bench 35%, 535 samples	6x

GPU
Radeon 3100 GraphicsATIBench 0%, 1,215 samples	19x
HD 5870AMDBench 19%, 10,176 samples	3x
Radeon HD 5450AMDBench 1%, 66,079 samples	2x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	3x
AS350 128GBApacerBench 65%, 2,222 samples	2x
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $38Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	1x

RAM
35GBUnknownBench 13%, 2,113 samples	10x
41GBUnknownBench 17%, 2,583 samples	6x
39GBUnknownBench 18%, 2,202 samples	5x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 22% - Poor

Total price: $28

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16