Dell Studio XPS 435MT

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics1.93% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive47.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (79%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemDell Studio XPS 435MT  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 0R849J
Memory1.1 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20091221
Uptime5.9 Days
Run DateSep 13 '21 at 21:26
Run Duration200 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 79%

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-920-$90
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
63.9% Good
Memory 90.4
1-Core 64.2
2-Core 116
58% 90.2 Pts
4-Core 205
8-Core 316
32% 260 Pts
64-Core 317
20% 317 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 63.9%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 610
Asus(1043 847B) 1GB
CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 300 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
1.93% Terrible
Lighting 2.2
Reflection 2.3
Parallax 0.6
2% 1.7 fps
MRender 4.2
Gravity 2.2
Splatting 2
2% 2.8 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.93%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Mushkin ECO3 480GB-$155
21GB free (System drive)
Firmware: O1126A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 197 171 124 81 72 79 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
47.9% Average
Read 202
Write 198
Mixed 180
SusWrite 120
39% 175 MB/s
4K Read 22.7
4K Write 41
4K Mixed 30.5
95% 31.4 MB/s
DQ Read 35.9
DQ Write 74.1
DQ Mixed 47.1
38% 52.4 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 47.9%
Great: 101%
WD WD10EAVS-00D7B1 1TB
288GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 55 54 56 54 56 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
34.2% Below average
Read 63.6
Write 62
Mixed 43.2
SusWrite 55.2
41% 56 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.9
163% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 34.2%
Great: 51%
Generic USB Flash Disk 4GB
1GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.7 0.1 0.8 6.9 6.9 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
2.76% Terrible
Read 5
Write 6.2
Mixed 6
SusWrite 3.6
7% 5.2 MB/s
4K Read 2.7
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.4
30% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2.76%
Great: 7%
TEAC USB HS-CF Card 0GB
0GB free, PID 0200
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
0.94% Terrible
Read 1.7
Write 0.7
Mixed 1.2
SusWrite 0.9
1% 1.12 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.2
13% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.94%
Great: 4%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 6x1GB
6 of 6 slots used
6GB DIMM
Performing below potential (39th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
41.3% Average
MC Read 15.4
MC Write 11.9
MC Mixed 15.8
41% 14.4 GB/s
SC Read 8.8
SC Write 8.8
SC Mixed 10.2
26% 9.27 GB/s
Latency 66.7
60% 66.7 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 41.3%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 1 4 2 30 34" 1280 720 MSI1462 MSI MAG341CQ
Typical Studio XPS 435MT Builds (Compare 319 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Dell Studio XPS 435MT

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 50% - Above average Total price: $199
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback