Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X571GT_F571GT

Performance Results


Gaming 13% Tree trunk	Desktop 80% Battleship	Workstation 13% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	6.31% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	142% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X571GT_F571GT (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK X571GT
Memory	12.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20210618
Uptime	2.3 Days
Run Date	Sep 13 '21 at 19:01
Run Duration	186 Seconds
Run User	ITA-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing as expected (57^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-9750H 328,182 User benchmarks, average bench 73% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	82% Excellent	Memory 83.2 1-Core 132 2-Core 259 87% 158 Pts	4-Core 435 8-Core 678 69% 557 Pts	64-Core 777 48% 777 Pts
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 82% Great: 87%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630 FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Asus(1043 1A81) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 25.20.100.6617 Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	6.31% Terrible	Lighting 6.5 Reflection 62.7 Parallax 8.1 5% 25.8 fps	MRender 11 Gravity 7.3 Splatting 11.5 8% 9.93 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 6.31% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel 660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$60 162,275 User benchmarks, average bench 156% 275GB free (System drive) Firmware: 002C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 671 213 171 52 57 55 MB/s Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	142% Outstanding	Read 972 Write 761 Mixed 741 SusWrite 203 149% 669 MB/s	4K Read 50.2 4K Write 120 4K Mixed 64.8 222% 78.2 MB/s	DQ Read 324 DQ Write 655 DQ Mixed 219 243% 399 MB/s
Poor: 94% ↑ This bench: 142% Great: 209%
USB SanDisk 3.2Gen1 32GB 3,459 User benchmarks, average bench 32% 18GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 19 19 19 19 19 MB/s Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	28.3% Poor	Read 139 Write 19 Mixed 30.9 SusWrite 18.9 50% 51.9 MB/s	4K Read 6.7 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 0.3 62% 2.6 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 28.3% Great: 48%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A1K43DB1-CTD 16GB 928 User benchmarks, average bench 74% 2400, 2667 MHz 8192, 8192 MB Performing as expected (46^th percentile)	74.2% Very good	MC Read 29.4 MC Write 28.6 MC Mixed 20.8 75% 26.3 GB/s	SC Read 16.8 SC Write 28.1 SC Mixed 24.3 66% 23.1 GB/s	Latency 74.8 53% 74.8 ns
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 74.2% Great: 82%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 25: 4R 1G 2B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
25%	7%	104	300	213	60	15.5"	1536 864	LGD0563

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X571GT_F571GT Builds (Compare 619 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 65%

Destroyer

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X571GT_F571GT

CPU
Core i5-9300HIntelBench 65%, 116,682 samples	240x
Core i5-8300HIntelBench 65%, 167,898 samples	200x
Core i7-9750HIntelBench 73%, 328,182 samples	146x

GPU
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 506,702 samples	398x
GTX 1650 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 41%, 92,838 samples	221x

SSD
660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBIntel $60Bench 156%, 162,275 samples	366x
HFM256GDJTNG-8310A 256GBBench 121%, 26,870 samples	86x
SSDPEKNU512GZ 512GBIntelBench 185%, 19,397 samples	50x

RAM
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	182x
HMA851S6JJR6N-VK 8GBHynixBench 64%, 485 samples	81x
HMA81GS6JJR8N-VK 16GBHynixBench 76%, 1,437 samples	69x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 51% - Above average

Total price: $60

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16