Asus ASUS TUF Dash F15 FX516PE_TUF516PE

Performance Results


Gaming 27% Raft	Desktop 70% Battle cruiser	Workstation 25% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (13th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 87 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 61%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	39.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	136% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	Asus ASUS TUF Dash F15 FX516PE_TUF516PE (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK FX516PE
Memory	2.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20210820
Uptime	0.8 Days
Run Date	Sep 13 '21 at 14:20
Run Duration	202 Seconds
Run User	PAN-User
Background CPU	16%

PC Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-11370H 12,227 User benchmarks, average bench 74% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	61% Good	Memory 56.5 1-Core 113 2-Core 181 65% 117 Pts	4-Core 352 8-Core 608 58% 480 Pts	64-Core 586 36% 586 Pts
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 61% Great: 81%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3050-Ti (Laptop) 35,839 User benchmarks, average bench 61% Asus(1043 13DC) ≥ 4GB Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 30.0.14.7196 Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	39.9% Below average	Lighting 50.4 Reflection 57.5 Parallax 47.7 41% 51.9 fps	MRender 45.7 Gravity 45 Splatting 46.7 38% 45.8 fps
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 39.9% Great: 72%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Nvme SAMSUNG MZVLQ512HBLU-00B00 512GB 7,990 User benchmarks, average bench 183% 201GB free (System drive) Firmware: FXM7201Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 810 917 396 152 142 135 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	136% Outstanding	Read 931 Write 1027 Mixed 867 SusWrite 425 183% 813 MB/s	4K Read 26.8 4K Write 92.7 4K Mixed 50.3 154% 56.6 MB/s	DQ Read 776 DQ Write 286 DQ Mixed 687 467% 583 MB/s
Poor: 111% ↑ This bench: 136% Great: 253%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 4ATF1G64HZ-3G2E1 1x8GB 20,126 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 1 of 1 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	35.1% Below average	MC Read 13.5 MC Write 12.9 MC Mixed 9.8 34% 12.1 GB/s	SC Read 10.7 SC Write 14 SC Mixed 11.6 35% 12.1 GB/s	Latency 138 29% 138 ns
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 35.1% Great: 44%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 32: 4R 3G 3B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
32%	48%	21	85	31	60	15.5"	1536 864	BOE090F

History: Score 25: 3R 2G 4B | Score 32: 4R 3G 3B

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical ASUS TUF Dash F15 FX516PE_TUF516PE Builds (Compare 784 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 14%

Tree trunk

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 13%

Tree trunk

System: Asus ASUS TUF Dash F15 FX516PE_TUF516PE

CPU
Core i7-11370HIntelBench 74%, 12,227 samples	784x

GPU
Iris XeIntelBench 14%, 144,774 samples	462x
RTX 3050-Ti (Laptop)NvidiaBench 61%, 35,839 samples	319x
RTX 3070Nvidia $400Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	2x

SSD
SAMSUNG MZVLQ512HBLU-00B00 512GBNvmeBench 183%, 7,990 samples	334x
INTEL SSDPEKNU512GZ 512GBNvmeBench 197%, 18,245 samples	211x
HFM512GD3JX013N 512GBNvmeBench 257%, 7,746 samples	26x

RAM
4ATF1G64HZ-3G2B1 1x8GBMicronBench 30%, 1,021 samples	129x
M471A1G44AB0-CWE 1x8GBSamsungBench 39%, 19,438 samples	116x
4ATF1G64HZ-3G2E1 1x8GBMicronBench 38%, 20,126 samples	64x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $46

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16