Foxconn M61PMP/M61PMP-K

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 49% Yacht	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	13.4% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago.

Motherboard	Foxconn M61PMP/M61PMP-K (all builds)
Memory	4.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display	4096 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20110511
Uptime	4.3 Days
Run Date	Sep 13 '21 at 12:51
Run Duration	169 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	10%

PC Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Athlon II X4 630 7,197 User benchmarks, average bench 45% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	49.1% Average	Memory 70.7 1-Core 40.1 2-Core 81.1 42% 64 Pts	4-Core 162 8-Core 162 22% 162 Pts	64-Core 161 10% 161 Pts
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 49.1% Great: 53%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 650-Ti-$152 36,698 User benchmarks, average bench 14% Zotac(19DA 4263) 2GB CLim: 941 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.71 Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	13.4% Very poor	Lighting 15.5 Reflection 15.9 Parallax 20.5 13% 17.3 fps	MRender 20.3 Gravity 20.3 Splatting 15.6 15% 18.7 fps
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 13.4% Great: 15%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 120GB-$80 69,224 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 84GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT0 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 1,203 Write 27.9 Mixed 57.2 90% 429 MB/s	4K Read 225 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 4 347% 77.1 MB/s
Poor: 64% Great: 115%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 3TB 8,194 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 136GB free Firmware: 0.1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 123 122 108 131 125 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	62.5% Good	Read 98.9 Write 60.2 Mixed 63.6 SusWrite 119 63% 85.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.9 170% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 62.5% Great: 112%
Samsung D3 Station 5TB 431 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 203GB free, PID 6126 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 20 18 18 18 18 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	16.5% Very poor	Read 20.1 Write 21.1 Mixed 18.2 SusWrite 18.1 26% 19.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 3.1 4K Mixed 0.6 128% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 16.5% Great: 88%
SMI USB DISK 64GB 1,634 User benchmarks, average bench 22% 28GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 6 11 11 11 10 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	9.02% Terrible	Read 22.6 Write 21.2 Mixed 21.9 SusWrite 10.3 25% 19 MB/s	4K Read 4.4 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 1.6 98% 2.27 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 9.02% Great: 40%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown PSD34G13332 F3-10666CL9-4GBNT0 8GB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 667, 667 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	31.8% Below average	MC Read 14.1 MC Write 7.2 MC Mixed 12.4 32% 11.2 GB/s	SC Read 7.1 SC Write 6 SC Mixed 8.7 21% 7.27 GB/s	Latency 99.8 40% 99.8 ns
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 31.8% Great: 32%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical M61PMP/M61PMP-K Builds (Compare 12 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 9%

Tree trunk

Desktop 51%

Yacht

Workstation 8%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Foxconn M61PMP/M61PMP-K

CPU
Athlon II X4 645AMDBench 46%, 5,346 samples	2x
Athlon II X3 455AMD $90Bench 45%, 3,733 samples	2x
Athlon II X4 630AMDBench 45%, 7,197 samples	2x

GPU
GTX 650-TiNvidia $152Bench 14%, 36,698 samples	2x
GeForce GT 220NvidiaBench 2%, 19,671 samples	2x
GeForce 6150SE nForce 430NvidiaBench 0%, 4,836 samples	2x

SSD
WDS2 40G2G0A-00JH 240GBWDCBench 41%, 27 samples	1x
0 120GBPh6-ce12Bench 64%, 23 samples	1x
128GB 128GBDogfishBench 60%, 387 samples	1x

RAM
PSD34G13332 F3-10666CL9-4GBNT0 8GBUnknownBench 30%, 6 samples	2x
JM1333KLN-4G 1x4GBTranscendBench 26%, 2,367 samples	2x
HMT351U6BFR8C-H9 2x4GBHynixBench 46%, 5,138 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 22% - Poor

Total price: $152

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16