Razer Blade

Performance Results


Gaming 40% Speed boat	Desktop 81% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 34% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	48.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	120% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

System	Razer Blade (all builds)
Motherboard	Razer Razer
Memory	8.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170912
Uptime	5.3 Days
Run Date	Sep 13 '21 at 07:23
Run Duration	230 Seconds
Run User	AUS-User
Background CPU	16%

PC Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7700HQ 473,208 User benchmarks, average bench 62% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	71% Very good	Memory 85.2 1-Core 100 2-Core 198 74% 128 Pts	4-Core 308 8-Core 436 47% 372 Pts	64-Core 480 30% 480 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 71% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060 (Mobile) 177,775 User benchmarks, average bench 47% Device(1A58 6755) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 460.89 Performing below potential (77^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	48.7% Average	Lighting 58.1 Reflection 69.7 Parallax 60.7 47% 62.8 fps	MRender 66.7 Gravity 59.4 Splatting 62 51% 62.7 fps
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 48.7% Great: 52%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLV256HCHP-00000 256GB 3,154 User benchmarks, average bench 121% 87GB free (System drive) Firmware: BXV7000Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 201 160 166 159 158 246 MB/s Performing as expected (48^th percentile)	120% Outstanding	Read 943 Write 142 Mixed 212 SusWrite 182 80% 370 MB/s	4K Read 35.4 4K Write 107 4K Mixed 35.5 156% 59.2 MB/s	DQ Read 859 DQ Write 239 DQ Mixed 387 327% 495 MB/s
Poor: 83% ↑ This bench: 120% Great: 144%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A5244BB0-CRC 2x8GB 2,214 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	73.6% Very good	MC Read 27 MC Write 28 MC Mixed 23.9 75% 26.3 GB/s	SC Read 14.2 SC Write 27.9 SC Mixed 22.2 61% 21.4 GB/s	Latency 71.8 56% 71.8 ns
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 73.6% Great: 77%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 4: 0R 1G 1B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
4%	2%	120	260	174	60	23.8"	1920 1080	ACR076F VG242Y P

History: Score 31: 3R 3G 7B | Score 42: 4R 4G 10B | Score 4: 0R 1G 1B

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Blade Builds (Compare 4,020 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 13%

Tree trunk

Desktop 70%

Battleship

Workstation 12%

Tree trunk

System: Razer Blade

CPU
Core i7-8750HIntelBench 70%, 442,631 samples	2,059x
Core i7-9750HIntelBench 73%, 328,182 samples	1,066x
Core i7-7700HQIntelBench 62%, 473,208 samples	469x

GPU
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 506,702 samples	1,444x
RTX 2070 (Mobile Max-Q)NvidiaBench 79%, 10,818 samples	595x
GTX 1060 (Mobile Max-Q)NvidiaBench 43%, 36,643 samples	397x

SSD
PM981 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsungBench 217%, 80,540 samples	816x
PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsungBench 196%, 44,403 samples	287x
CA3-8D512 512GBLiteonBench 168%, 4,424 samples	248x

RAM
M471A1K43CB1-CTD 2x8GBSamsungBench 76%, 108,106 samples	1,752x
M471A1K43DB1-CTD 2x8GBSamsungBench 76%, 43,895 samples	371x
M471A5244BB0-CRC 2x8GBSamsungBench 72%, 2,214 samples	290x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16