Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics24.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive228% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory28 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210320
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 13 '21 at 02:48
Run Duration153 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X-$210
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
84.3% Excellent
Memory 78.3
1-Core 126
2-Core 245
82% 150 Pts
4-Core 484
8-Core 862
81% 673 Pts
64-Core 1,312
81% 1,312 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 84.3%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 471.41
Performing below potential (43rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
24.7% Poor
Lighting 31
Reflection 32.5
Parallax 30.8
25% 31.4 fps
MRender 36.5
Gravity 31.4
Splatting 21.8
24% 29.9 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 24.7%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 660p NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$74
795GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 002C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1167 1208 1218 1237 1239 1209 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
228% Outstanding
Read 1,451
Write 1,243
Mixed 1009
SusWrite 1,213
276% 1,229 MB/s
4K Read 51.8
4K Write 107
4K Mixed 65.6
219% 74.8 MB/s
DQ Read 631
DQ Write 612
DQ Mixed 271
300% 505 MB/s
Poor: 127%
This bench: 228%
Great: 255%
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$80
1.5TB free
Firmware: MX6OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 132 135 137 135 137 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
79.9% Very good
Read 144
Write 140
Mixed 34.1
SusWrite 134
82% 113 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.8
178% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 79.9%
Great: 107%
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$80
2TB free
Firmware: MX6OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 170 181 185 178 183 190 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 178
Write 177
Mixed 31
SusWrite 181
102% 142 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.5
130% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 103%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS16G4D32AESC.M16FE 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (26th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
83.2% Excellent
MC Read 31.4
MC Write 29.7
MC Mixed 27.5
84% 29.5 GB/s
SC Read 24.4
SC Write 30.6
SC Mixed 27.2
78% 27.4 GB/s
Latency 83.7
48% 83.7 ns
Poor: 71%
This bench: 83.2%
Great: 119%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 9 7 30 65" 1280 701 SNY7105 SONY TV *00
Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS Builds (Compare 6,828 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS - $192

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 98% - Outstanding Total price: $932
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback