Asus M5A97 EVO R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics35.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (32%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardAsus M5A97 EVO R2.0  (all builds)
Memory9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131125
Uptime1.2 Days
Run DateSep 12 '21 at 18:29
Run Duration233 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU 32%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8300-$168
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.3 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
65% Good
Memory 84
1-Core 73.7
2-Core 135
60% 97.5 Pts
4-Core 250
8-Core 425
41% 337 Pts
64-Core 433
27% 433 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 65%
Great: 64%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 770-$279
Gigabyte(1458 3603) 2GB
CLim: 1293 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 471.11
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
35.7% Below average
Lighting 41.1
Reflection 50
Parallax 48.6
34% 46.6 fps
MRender 55.9
Gravity 52
Splatting 41.6
40% 49.8 fps
Poor: 32%
This bench: 35.7%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial BX500 240GB-$29
6GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M6CR013
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 473
Write 391
Mixed 11
64% 292 MB/s
4K Read 26.4
4K Write 6.5
4K Mixed 0.4
44% 11.1 MB/s
Poor: 30% Great: 92%
Crucial MTFDDAK128MAY-1AH1ZABHA 128GB
59GB free
Firmware: M504
SusWrite @10s intervals: 202 60 49 47 43 41 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
67.4% Good
Read 406
Write 338
Mixed 271
SusWrite 73.5
61% 272 MB/s
4K Read 24.7
4K Write 66
4K Mixed 33.1
115% 41.3 MB/s
DQ Read 260
DQ Write 236
DQ Mixed 163
146% 220 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 67.4%
Great: 101%
Hitachi HDT721010SLA360 1TB-$497
241GB free
Firmware: ST6OA3AA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 97 97 97 98 97 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
49.1% Average
Read 74.3
Write 81.2
Mixed 43.6
SusWrite 96.7
54% 73.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
161% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 49.1%
Great: 61%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$50
575GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 117 109 116 116 117 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 145
Write 169
Mixed 74.9
SusWrite 113
92% 126 MB/s
4K Read 2.3
4K Write 0.6
160% 1.45 MB/s
Poor: 53% Great: 106%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL RipjawsX DDR3 2400 C11 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 800 MHz
Performing below potential (15th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
44.2% Average
MC Read 18.7
MC Write 14.1
MC Mixed 14.4
45% 15.7 GB/s
SC Read 9.9
SC Write 7.9
SC Mixed 11.6
28% 9.8 GB/s
Latency 73.5
54% 73.5 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 44.2%
Great: 86%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 34: 5R 1G 6B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
34% 40% 30 98 1 60 22" 1680 1050 ACR0229 Acer B223WL
History: Score 33: 4R 2G 7B | Score 34: 5R 1G 6B
Typical M5A97 EVO R2.0 Builds (Compare 579 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus M5A97 EVO R2.0 - $166

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 70% - Very good Total price: $512
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback