PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
Graphics | 24.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 25.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asrock H61M-VG4 (all builds) |
Memory | 4.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz |
Display | 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors, 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20130712 |
Uptime | 1.2 Days |
Run Date | Sep 12 '21 at 18:07 |
Run Duration | 227 Seconds |
Run User | THA-User |
Background CPU | 4% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Xeon E3-1245 V2-$368
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
|
71.1%
Very good
|
|||
Graphics Cards | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below potential (15th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
24.5%
Poor
|
|||
Intel HD P4000 (Server 1.25 GHz)
ASRock(1849 016A) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4252
|
3.58%
Terrible
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
SanDisk SSD Plus 120GB-$42
51GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Z32070RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 52 57 60 64 62 MB/s
|
25.9%
Poor
|
|||
Hitachi HTS547564A9E384 640GB
458GB free
Firmware: JEDOA60A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 76 81 81 81 80 MB/s
|
47%
Average
|
|||
WD Blue 2.5" 320GB (2009)-$80
296GB free
Firmware: 11.01A11
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 5.4 5.6 6.3 10 6.4 MB/s
|
3.74%
Terrible
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
38.1%
Below average
|
||||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware
Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0% | 0% | 0 | 7 | 5 | 60 | 18.5" | 1280 720 | ACR0190 Acer G195HQL |
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples | 70x |
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples | 50x |
Core i5-2400Intel $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples | 25x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 36x |
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples | 27x |
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples | 27x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 91% - Outstanding | Total price: $146 |