Asus B85M-GAMER

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 10% Tree trunk	Desktop 51% Yacht	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (11th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 89 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	23.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus B85M-GAMER (all builds)
Memory	21.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150923
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Sep 12 '21 at 13:40
Run Duration	237 Seconds
Run User	BEL-User
Background CPU	100%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-4430S 2,460 User benchmarks, average bench 66% SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (0^th percentile)	37.4% Below average	Memory 58.3 1-Core 73.5 2-Core 88.9 46% 73.6 Pts	4-Core 91 8-Core 139 14% 115 Pts	64-Core 124 8% 124 Pts
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 37.4% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Asus(1043 85D3) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 471.96 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	23.2% Poor	Lighting 29.8 Reflection 29.1 Parallax 28.2 24% 29 fps	MRender 27.6 Gravity 31.4 Splatting 20.3 21% 26.4 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 23.2% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$31 1,562,409 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 374GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVQ01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 80 82 84 80 80 MB/s Relative performance n/a - drive id incomplete or inconclusive		Read 401 Write 83.8 Mixed 121 SusWrite 81.1 126% 172 MB/s	4K Read 17 4K Write 73.6 4K Mixed 22.3 4,549% 37.6 MB/s	DQ Read 182 DQ Write 89.2 DQ Mixed 113 1,103% 128 MB/s
Poor: 55% Great: 112%
Seagate SkyHawk 4TB (2016)-$90 7,966 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 2TB free Firmware: CV11 SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 131 131 127 135 138 MB/s Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	79.4% Very good	Read 146 Write 146 Mixed 60.6 SusWrite 131 88% 121 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.9 167% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 79.4% Great: 107%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1866 C10 4x8GB 12,722 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	39.8% Below average	MC Read 11.9 MC Write 18.1 MC Mixed 13 41% 14.3 GB/s	SC Read 7.7 SC Write 13.9 SC Mixed 11.3 31% 11 GB/s	Latency 133 30% 133 ns
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 39.8% Great: 80%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 36: 4R 4G 4B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
36%	57%	21	113	30	60	24.1"	1920 1200	SAM09D5 S24C450

History: Score 2: 0R 0G 2B | Score 36: 4R 4G 4B

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical B85M-GAMER Builds (Compare 498 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 25%

Surfboard

Desktop 72%

Battleship

Workstation 20%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus B85M-GAMER

CPU
Core i5-4460Intel $194Bench 62%, 245,403 samples	128x
Core i7-4790Intel $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples	82x
Core i7-4790KIntel $348Bench 79%, 455,746 samples	50x

GPU
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	66x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	49x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	38x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	22x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	16x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	15x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	28x
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	13x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 2x4GBKingstonBench 49%, 26,466 samples	12x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 52% - Above average

Total price: $420

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16