Gigabyte X570 AORUS ELITE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 67%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 63%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics75% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive103% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardGigabyte X570 AORUS ELITE  (all builds)
Memory11 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200915
Uptime1.2 Days
Run DateSep 12 '21 at 10:35
Run Duration159 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 1660S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$82
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
86.2% Excellent
Memory 68.3
1-Core 146
2-Core 286
88% 167 Pts
4-Core 558
8-Core 820
86% 689 Pts
64-Core 1,041
64% 1,041 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 86.2%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$233
Gigabyte(1458 4014) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2175 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 471.96
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
75% Very good
Lighting 94.4
Reflection 90.9
Parallax 84.3
77% 89.9 fps
MRender 113
Gravity 81.1
Splatting 73.5
71% 89.2 fps
Poor: 65%
This bench: 75%
Great: 76%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
156GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 363 285 282 275 280 282 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 490
Write 436
Mixed 363
SusWrite 295
89% 396 MB/s
4K Read 41.5
4K Write 88.5
4K Mixed 54.2
179% 61.4 MB/s
DQ Read 217
DQ Write 183
DQ Mixed 199
149% 200 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 103%
Great: 124%
Kingdian S280 480GB
260GB free
Firmware: S1216A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 351 376 368 377 380 378 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
89.5% Excellent
Read 491
Write 397
Mixed 371
SusWrite 372
92% 408 MB/s
4K Read 30.2
4K Write 84.6
4K Mixed 30.5
130% 48.4 MB/s
DQ Read 182
DQ Write 175
DQ Mixed 48.7
72% 135 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 89.5%
Great: 128%
USB SanDisk 3.2Gen1 64GB
57GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 47 42 27 22 20 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
37.5% Below average
Read 147
Write 30.4
Mixed 38.8
SusWrite 31.9
65% 62.1 MB/s
4K Read 7.8
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 4.5
264% 4.9 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 37.5%
Great: 48%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 3733 C17 Series 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
68.9% Good
MC Read 29.4
MC Write 18.1
MC Mixed 26.8
71% 24.8 GB/s
SC Read 21.4
SC Write 17.9
SC Mixed 25.3
62% 21.5 GB/s
Latency 105
38% 105 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 68.9%
Great: 116%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 10 8 60 84.6" 1280 701 SAM0F0B SAMSUNG
Typical GA-X570 AORUS ELITE Builds (Compare 10,746 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 159%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 161%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte X570 AORUS ELITE - $220

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $1,493
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback