Intel X79

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics31% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive111% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardIntel X79  (all builds)
Memory12.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180424
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateSep 12 '21 at 09:59
Run Duration156 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2690 0
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
75.9% Very good
Memory 86.2
1-Core 93.5
2-Core 187
71% 122 Pts
4-Core 353
8-Core 696
62% 524 Pts
64-Core 876
54% 876 Pts
Poor: 64%
This bench: 75.9%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 280X-$500
XFX(1682 3001) 3GB
CLim: 1000 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 21.3.2
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
31% Below average
Lighting 42.2
Reflection 32.5
Parallax 57.8
34% 44.2 fps
MRender 28
Gravity 42.8
Splatting 21.5
24% 30.8 fps
Poor: 31%
This bench: 31%
Great: 39%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
M Series NVMe SSD 256G 256GB
79GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S0614B0 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 333 279 165 250 216 114 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
111% Outstanding
Read 1442
Write 1,168
Mixed 852
SusWrite 226
205% 922 MB/s
4K Read 28.3
4K Write 43.9
4K Mixed 17.5
88% 29.9 MB/s
DQ Read 573
DQ Write 36.9
DQ Mixed 40.1
96% 217 MB/s
Poor: 116%
This bench: 111%
Great: 252%
WD WD6402AAEX-00Z3A0 640GB
179GB free
Firmware: 01.01V01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 100 97 101 100 100 MB/s
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
60.5% Good
Read 111
Write 98.5
Mixed 82.1
SusWrite 99.1
72% 97.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 0.9
189% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 60.5%
Great: 76%
Maxtor STM3250310AS 250GB
60GB free
Firmware: 3.AAC
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 82 81 82 82 82 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
45.5% Average
Read 77
Write 38
Mixed 44
SusWrite 81.4
44% 60.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.8
134% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 45.5%
Great: 53%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Dimm2_Manufacturer M393B5170GB0- Dimm3_Manufacturer M393B5170GB0- Dimm6_Manufacturer M393B5170GB0- Dimm7_Manufacturer M393B5170GB0- 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
54.8% Above average
MC Read 22.2
MC Write 18.6
MC Mixed 18
56% 19.6 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 12.3
SC Mixed 12.5
38% 13.4 GB/s
Latency 71.1
56% 71.1 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 54.8%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 9 7 50 31.5" 1280 701 MEIA0A7 Panasonic-TV
Typical X79 Builds (Compare 1,973 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Intel X79

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 71% - Very good Total price: $158
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback