Gigabyte GA-B450M GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 105%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 100%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics133% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive83.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-B450M GAMING  (all builds)
Memory12.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201209
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 12 '21 at 08:47
Run Duration198 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 3060-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$83
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
82.2% Excellent
Memory 62.9
1-Core 145
2-Core 288
86% 165 Pts
4-Core 544
8-Core 833
85% 689 Pts
64-Core 1,048
65% 1,048 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 82.2%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti-$340
Nvidia(10DE 153C) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2280 MHz, MLim: 3700 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 471.96
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
133% Outstanding
Lighting 186
Reflection 177
Parallax 165
152% 176 fps
MRender 188
Gravity 143
Splatting 124
121% 151 fps
Poor: 116%
This bench: 133%
Great: 136%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZNTY256HDHP-000B1 256GB
32GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MAT2100Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 273 36 36 33 33 33 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
83.9% Excellent
Read 516
Write 481
Mixed 350
SusWrite 74
79% 355 MB/s
4K Read 39.3
4K Write 93.3
4K Mixed 47
169% 59.9 MB/s
DQ Read 197
DQ Write 93.7
DQ Mixed 125
98% 139 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 83.9%
Great: 112%
Adata SU650 120GB-$14
29GB free
Firmware: V4.7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 199 72 73 71 72 72 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
72.4% Very good
Read 483
Write 338
Mixed 322
SusWrite 93.3
69% 309 MB/s
4K Read 35.2
4K Write 87.7
4K Mixed 26
133% 49.6 MB/s
DQ Read 136
DQ Write 221
DQ Mixed 32.2
66% 130 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 72.4%
Great: 88%
Adata SP580 120GB
36GB free
Firmware: V3.10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 330 73 71 73 72 72 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
59.9% Above average
Read 446
Write 359
Mixed 294
SusWrite 115
68% 304 MB/s
4K Read 26.4
4K Write 80.2
4K Mixed 12.7
99% 39.8 MB/s
DQ Read 82.1
DQ Write 222
DQ Mixed 17.5
52% 107 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 59.9%
Great: 70%
Seagate ST3500312CS 500GB-$24
110GB free
Firmware: SS16
SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 64 71 73 72 73 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
42.1% Average
Read 76
Write 78.3
Mixed 49.1
SusWrite 70.6
50% 68.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
130% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 42.1%
Great: 60%
BUFFALO HD-PCTU3 1TB
68GB free, PID 01de
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 48 55 63 64 67 50 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
30.6% Below average
Read 87.2
Write 50
Mixed 54.2
SusWrite 57.8
80% 62.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
87% 1 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 30.6%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C16 1x16GB
1 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
33.6% Below average
MC Read 11.7
MC Write 10.9
MC Mixed 11.2
32% 11.3 GB/s
SC Read 11.7
SC Write 11.9
SC Mixed 12
34% 11.9 GB/s
Latency 119
34% 119 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 33.6%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 9 7 144 24" 1280 720 GSM5B38 24GM79G
Typical GA-B450M GAMING Builds (Compare 1,909 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 49%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 46%
Yacht

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B450M GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 103% - Outstanding Total price: $286
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback