Asrock Z270 Pro4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 111%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 96%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics123% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive113% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock Z270 Pro4  (all builds)
Memory26 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170720
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateSep 12 '21 at 04:37
Run Duration262 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$242
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
88.3% Excellent
Memory 89.8
1-Core 134
2-Core 260
90% 161 Pts
4-Core 467
8-Core 733
74% 600 Pts
64-Core 740
46% 740 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 88.3%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
Asus(1043 85E5) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 471.96
Performing below potential (47th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
123% Outstanding
Lighting 167
Reflection 184
Parallax 177
136% 176 fps
MRender 133
Gravity 176
Splatting 121
115% 143 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 123%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$130
405GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 407 436 452 452 453 452 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
113% Outstanding
Read 479
Write 454
Mixed 353
SusWrite 442
97% 432 MB/s
4K Read 32.9
4K Write 112
4K Mixed 43.6
165% 62.9 MB/s
DQ Read 384
DQ Write 328
DQ Mixed 285
233% 333 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 113%
Great: 133%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 1TB
227GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1765 951 927 932 661 670 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 53% Great: 117%
Adata SX8100NP 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: VB411D45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1171 1271 1321 1340 1344 1340 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
312% Outstanding
Read 2,690
Write 1103
Mixed 1,301
SusWrite 1,298
354% 1,598 MB/s
4K Read 50.3
4K Write 148
4K Mixed 72.4
247% 90.2 MB/s
DQ Read 1,301
DQ Write 874
DQ Mixed 1,181
856% 1,118 MB/s
Poor: 119%
This bench: 312%
Great: 340%
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$80
2TB free
Firmware: MX6OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 181 180 185 184 186 183 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
109% Outstanding
Read 197
Write 197
Mixed 30.9
SusWrite 183
110% 152 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
155% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 109%
Great: 107%
WD easystore 2624 5TB
1.5TB free, PID 2624
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 58 56 60 59 59 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
24.5% Poor
Read 54.8
Write 56
Mixed 40.4
SusWrite 58.2
71% 52.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.6
63% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 24.5%
Great: 65%
Patriot Memory 32GB
2GB free, PID 5500
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 50
Write 34.8
Mixed 45
54% 43.3 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 1.1
76% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 6% Great: 51%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown DDR4 2400 2OZ 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
80.7% Excellent
MC Read 29.7
MC Write 31.4
MC Mixed 23.5
81% 28.2 GB/s
SC Read 18.3
SC Write 34.6
SC Mixed 27
76% 26.6 GB/s
Latency 67.5
59% 67.5 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 80.7%
Great: 107%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 8 6 60 24" 1280 720 ACI2493 VE247
Typical Z270 Pro4 Builds (Compare 1,370 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 71%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 61%
Destroyer

Motherboard: Asrock Z270 Pro4 - $176

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 94% - Outstanding Total price: $690
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback