Asus TUF Gaming FX505GT_FX505GT

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 33%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics42.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive107% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus TUF Gaming FX505GT_FX505GT  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FX505GT
Memory0.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201126
Uptime19.5 Days
Run DateSep 11 '21 at 22:05
Run Duration228 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9300H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
72.3% Very good
Memory 76.4
1-Core 115
2-Core 218
76% 136 Pts
4-Core 367
8-Core 596
59% 481 Pts
64-Core 576
36% 576 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 72.3%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650 (Mobile)
Asus(1043 1AB1) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 457.63
Performing below potential (52nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
42.3% Average
Lighting 54.4
Reflection 61
Parallax 50.1
44% 55.2 fps
MRender 41.5
Gravity 49.6
Splatting 48
38% 46.4 fps
Poor: 28%
This bench: 42.3%
Great: 46%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Micron_2200V_MTFDHBA512TCK 512GB
122GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P1MA0V4
SusWrite @10s intervals: 208 486 185 475 276 573 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 511
Write 525
Mixed 493
SusWrite 367
107% 474 MB/s
4K Read 33.4
4K Write 55.7
4K Mixed 41.1
133% 43.4 MB/s
DQ Read 460
DQ Write 562
DQ Mixed 632
443% 551 MB/s
Poor: 94%
This bench: 107%
Great: 181%
Seagate Portable 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: 9300
SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 40 41 41 41 41 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
21.5% Poor
Read 34.9
Write 35.8
Mixed 29.4
SusWrite 39.6
26% 34.9 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.8
159% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 21.5%
Great: 68%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43DB1-CTD 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below potential (32nd percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
37.7% Below average
MC Read 15.3
MC Write 13.1
MC Mixed 11.6
38% 13.3 GB/s
SC Read 11.8
SC Write 9.2
SC Mixed 5.6
25% 8.87 GB/s
Latency 87.4
46% 87.4 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 37.7%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 55: 8R 4G 3B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
55% 54% 28 236 154 60 31.6" 1920 1080 HPN365A HP 32f
History: Score 32: 4R 3G 3B | Score 55: 8R 4G 3B
Typical TUF Gaming FX505GT_FX505GT Builds (Compare 2,142 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Asus TUF Gaming FX505GT_FX505GT

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback