Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 23.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (51^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Atom N570 1,295 User benchmarks, average bench 21% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.65 GHz, turbo 1.65 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	23.5% Poor	Memory 43.6 1-Core 7.2 2-Core 13.2 18% 21.3 Pts	4-Core 22.5 8-Core 22.9 3% 22.7 Pts	64-Core 23.8 2% 23.8 Pts
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 23.5% Great: 26%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Hitachi HTS543232A7A384 320GB-$40 17,642 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 227GB free (System drive) Firmware: ES2O SusWrite @10s intervals: 49 55 61 58 61 62 MB/s Performing as expected (48^th percentile)	30.9% Below average	Read 49.9 Write 59.8 Mixed 24.9 SusWrite 57.7 35% 48.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.2 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.4 73% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 30.9% Great: 46%
SDHC Card 4GB 393 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 4GB free, PID 6366 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 15 16 15 15 15 MB/s Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	6.47% Terrible	Read 15.1 Write 13.7 Mixed 10.8 SusWrite 15.2 18% 13.7 MB/s	4K Read 2.8 4K Write 0.1 4K Mixed 0.1 17% 1 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 6.47% Great: 10%
Generic Flash Disk 8GB 32,093 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 8GB free, PID 6387 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.2 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.3 4.8 MB/s Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	4.27% Terrible	Read 16.5 Write 3.3 Mixed 2.7 SusWrite 4.6 7% 6.78 MB/s	4K Read 3.7 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 14% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 4.27% Great: 7%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 1x2GB 99,586 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 1 of 2 slots used 2GB DIMM 667 MHz Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	9.64% Terrible	MC Read 3.7 MC Write 2.7 MC Mixed 3 9% 3.13 GB/s	SC Read 1.3 SC Write 3.1 SC Mixed 1.7 6% 2.03 GB/s	Latency 186 22% 186 ns
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 9.64% Great: 26%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16