PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 66.9% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
Boot Drive | 90.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | HP Z840 Workstation (all builds) |
Motherboard | Hewlett-Packard 2129 |
Memory | 57.2 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
Display | 5760 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20210521 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Sep 11 '21 at 09:02 |
Run Duration | 207 Seconds |
Run User | JPN-User |
Background CPU | 9% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2690 v4
CPU0, 2 CPU, 28 cores, 56 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.25 GHz (avg)
|
67.9%
Good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132
CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 471.96
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
66.9%
Good
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Sandisk S3 2TB
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 20RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 322 389 415 418 419 422 MB/s
|
90.4%
Outstanding
|
|||
Seagate FireCuda 530 ZP500GM30013 500GB
185GB free
Firmware: SU6SM001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1271 1313 540 487 485 484 MB/s
|
189%
Outstanding
|
|||
Toshiba MD04ACA500 5TB-$154
4.5TB free
Firmware: FP2A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 192 202 200 193 202 198 MB/s
|
||||
MG04ACA500E 5TB
855GB free
Firmware: SJ1C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 179 177 183 179 180 181 MB/s
|
93.1%
Outstanding
|
|||
Microsoft Storage Space Device 10TB
5TB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 180 196 196 197 198 198 MB/s
|
112%
Outstanding
|
|||
Hitachi HUA721010KLA330 1TB-$28
793GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 41 41 41 42 42 MB/s
|
17.7%
Very poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung M393A1G40DB0-CPB 8x8GB
8 of 16 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
|
117%
Outstanding
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware
Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0% | 0% | 0 | 8 | 6 | 60 | 61.3" | 1280 720 | AUS23CC NV Surround |
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2680 v41stBench 66%, 1,252 samples | 132x |
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2620 v31stBench 63%, 2,624 samples | 117x |
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2690 v41stBench 72%, 529 samples | 99x |
GPU | |
---|---|
Quadro M4000NvidiaBench 32%, 9,043 samples | 150x |
Quadro K4200Nvidia $820Bench 21%, 7,330 samples | 103x |
Quadro K2200Nvidia $440Bench 16%, 13,860 samples | 94x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 118% - Outstanding | Total price: $95 |