PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 25.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asus P7P55D-E (all builds) |
Memory | 9.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20101214 |
Uptime | 0.6 Days |
Run Date | Sep 11 '21 at 04:38 |
Run Duration | 330 Seconds |
Run User | HKG-User |
Background CPU | 16% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
68.5%
Good
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 465.89
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
25.3%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Hitachi HTS543232L9A300 320GB-$45
114GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FB4OC40C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 7.3 8.6 9.2 17 20 MB/s
|
17.5%
Very poor
|
|||
WD Green 500GB (2009)-$23
87GB free
Firmware: 01.00A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 85 99 100 100 100 MB/s
|
50.8%
Above average
|
|||
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$25
154GB free
Firmware: MS1OA7C0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 132 141 141 141 141 MB/s
|
78.4%
Very good
|
|||
15.7%
Very poor
|
||||
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
105GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 85 99 100 100 100 MB/s
|
70.5%
Very good
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
|
40.1%
Average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware
Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
27% | 46% | 28 | 253 | 160 | 120 | 31.5" | 1920 1080 | AUS32C3 ASUS VG328 |
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5 760Intel $100Bench 64%, 34,495 samples | 257x |
Core i7 860Intel $339Bench 64%, 51,451 samples | 156x |
Core i7 870Intel $100Bench 66%, 37,228 samples | 142x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 70x |
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples | 45x |
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 43x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 97% - Outstanding | Total price: $159 |