Asus P7P55D-E

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics25.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus P7P55D-E  (all builds)
Memory9.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20101214
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateSep 11 '21 at 04:38
Run Duration330 Seconds
Run User HKG-User
Background CPU 16%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5 760-$100
LGA1156, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
68.5% Good
Memory 88.9
1-Core 80.4
2-Core 148
65% 106 Pts
4-Core 280
8-Core 282
38% 281 Pts
64-Core 285
18% 285 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 68.5%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 465.89
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
25.3% Poor
Lighting 35.4
Reflection 40.3
Parallax 38.3
29% 38 fps
MRender 37.8
Gravity 39.3
Splatting 0.3
18% 25.8 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 25.3%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HTS543232L9A300 320GB-$45
114GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FB4OC40C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 7.3 8.6 9.2 17 20 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
17.5% Very poor
Read 48
Write 38.5
Mixed 19.5
SusWrite 12.7
22% 29.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.6
104% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 17.5%
Great: 34%
WD Green 500GB (2009)-$23
87GB free
Firmware: 01.00A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 85 99 100 100 100 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
50.8% Above average
Read 81.6
Write 100
Mixed 53.6
SusWrite 95.1
61% 82.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
138% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 50.8%
Great: 54%
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$25
154GB free
Firmware: MS1OA7C0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 132 141 141 141 141 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
78.4% Very good
Read 136
Write 121
Mixed 30.9
SusWrite 137
77% 106 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.7
148% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 78.4%
Great: 103%
Seagate ST380011A 80GB-$43
3GB free
Firmware: 3.06
SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 29 29 28 28 29 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
15.7% Very poor
Read 26
Write 27.5
Mixed 23.6
SusWrite 28.6
20% 26.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.5
84% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 15.7%
Great: 30%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
105GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 85 99 100 100 100 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
70.5% Very good
Read 150
Write 131
Mixed 76.6
SusWrite 95.2
83% 113 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.2
233% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 70.5%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
40.1% Average
MC Read 15.4
MC Write 12.2
MC Mixed 13.5
39% 13.7 GB/s
SC Read 10.3
SC Write 9.3
SC Mixed 10.9
29% 10.2 GB/s
Latency 68.5
58% 68.5 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 40.1%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 27: 3R 1G 9B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
27% 46% 28 253 160 120 31.5" 1920 1080 AUS32C3 ASUS VG328
History: Score 19: 2R 2G 3B | Score 21: 1R 3G 7B | Score 27: 3R 1G 9B
Typical P7P55D-E Builds (Compare 779 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus P7P55D-E

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 97% - Outstanding Total price: $159
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback