Asus MAXIMUS VI EXTREME

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 38%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics54% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardAsus MAXIMUS VI EXTREME  (all builds)
Memory5.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20130507
Uptime7.6 Days
Run DateAug 11 '17 at 17:08
Run Duration380 Seconds
Run User THA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4770K-$120
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
74.9% Very good
Memory 83.9
1-Core 102
2-Core 198
74% 128 Pts
4-Core 356
8-Core 566
57% 461 Pts
64-Core 560
35% 560 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 74.9%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 353.62
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
54% Above average
Lighting 69.4
Reflection 68.3
Parallax 58.9
57% 65.5 fps
MRender 64.3
Gravity 62.6
Splatting 55
49% 60.6 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 54%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$150
815GB free
Firmware: 2B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
268% Outstanding
Read 2,445
Write 1,499
Mixed 1,369
390% 1,771 MB/s
4K Read 53
4K Write 122
4K Mixed 51.4
211% 75.5 MB/s
DQ Read 511
DQ Write 173
DQ Mixed 163
167% 282 MB/s
Poor: 157%
This bench: 268%
Great: 302%
NT-256 256GB
213GB free
Firmware: T170 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
84.2% Excellent
Read 518
Write 395
Mixed 451
101% 454 MB/s
4K Read 33
4K Write 95.9
4K Mixed 9.36
113% 46.1 MB/s
DQ Read 153
DQ Write 207
DQ Mixed 14.5
57% 125 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 84.2%
Great: 100%
OCZ Vector 512GB-$400
188GB free
Firmware: 3.0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
88.5% Excellent
Read 503
Write 456
Mixed 380
99% 447 MB/s
4K Read 29.2
4K Write 69.2
4K Mixed 23
110% 40.5 MB/s
DQ Read 269
DQ Write 73.7
DQ Mixed 52.3
70% 132 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 88.5%
Great: 112%
Samsung 840 Pro 256GB-$190
103GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXM0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 68% Great: 116%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$70
1.5TB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
30.3% Below average
Read 1.34
Write 104
Mixed 7.68
27% 37.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.69
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.2
84% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 30.3%
Great: 67%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$70
1.5TB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
58.5% Above average
Read 114
Write 89.4
Mixed 2.93
49% 68.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.73
4K Write 2.24
4K Mixed 0.2
94% 1.05 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 58.5%
Great: 67%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$70
1TB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
55.4% Above average
Read 105
Write 87.6
Mixed 26
53% 73 MB/s
4K Read 0.76
4K Write 1.12
4K Mixed 0.2
74% 0.69 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 55.4%
Great: 67%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ares DDR3 2400 C11 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (28th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
49.8% Average
MC Read 17.7
MC Write 18.3
MC Mixed 15.4
49% 17.1 GB/s
SC Read 12.1
SC Write 17.3
SC Mixed 15.7
43% 15 GB/s
Latency 73.6
54% 73.6 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 49.8%
Great: 89%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MAXIMUS VI EXTREME Builds (Compare 420 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 77%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 63%
Destroyer

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS VI EXTREME - $580

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $1,180
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback