HP ZBook 17

Performance Results


Gaming 20% Surfboard	Desktop 73% Battleship	Workstation 17% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	22.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	98.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	HP ZBook 17 (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 190A
Memory	25.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit barev, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit barev
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200303
Uptime	24.4 Days
Run Date	Sep 10 '21 at 19:24
Run Duration	242 Seconds
Run User	CZE-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing as expected (60^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4700MQ-$209 69,603 User benchmarks, average bench 59% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	64.7% Good	Memory 71.7 1-Core 95.5 2-Core 193 68% 120 Pts	4-Core 312 8-Core 482 49% 397 Pts	64-Core 499 31% 499 Pts
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 64.7% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K5100M 641 User benchmarks, average bench 21% HP(103C 190A) ≥ 4GB CLim: 771 MHz, MLim: 900 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 426.25 Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	22.6% Poor	Lighting 26.8 Reflection 22.9 Parallax 34.1 22% 27.9 fps	MRender 29.4 Gravity 33.7 Splatting 26.2 24% 29.8 fps
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 22.6% Great: 23%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$115 141,929 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 88GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXM01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 406 434 433 449 438 427 MB/s Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	98.8% Outstanding	Read 495 Write 458 Mixed 350 SusWrite 431 97% 433 MB/s	4K Read 28.2 4K Write 65.8 4K Mixed 36.2 124% 43.4 MB/s	DQ Read 349 DQ Write 290 DQ Mixed 340 249% 326 MB/s
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 98.8% Great: 124%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 750GB 4,800 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 465GB free Firmware: JB2OA3K0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 95 94 97 95 97 MB/s Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	53.9% Above average	Read 92.5 Write 94.2 Mixed 21.2 SusWrite 95.2 55% 75.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.6 127% 1 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 53.9% Great: 74%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B1G73DB0-YK0 4x8GB 2,172 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB SODIMM DDR3 1600 MHz Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	53.6% Above average	MC Read 20.4 MC Write 20 MC Mixed 16 54% 18.8 GB/s	SC Read 14.4 SC Write 18.2 SC Mixed 19 49% 17.2 GB/s	Latency 97.4 41% 97.4 ns
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 53.6% Great: 66%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 52: 8R 2G 6B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
52%	18%	91	289	208	60	33.1"	1920 1080	AOC3279 Q3279WG5B

History: Score 19: 2R 2G 3B | Score 60: 9R 4G 3B | Score 52: 8R 2G 6B

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical ZBook 17 Builds (Compare 206 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 12%

Tree trunk

Desktop 65%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 11%

Tree trunk

System: HP ZBook 17

CPU
Core i7-4800MQIntel $150Bench 63%, 22,632 samples	72x
Core i7-4700MQIntel $209Bench 59%, 69,603 samples	56x
Core i7-4900MQIntel $110Bench 68%, 5,651 samples	18x

GPU
Quadro K3100MNvidiaBench 11%, 2,978 samples	114x
HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 258,091 samples	31x
Quadro K5100MNvidiaBench 21%, 641 samples	24x

SSD
MX500 2TBCrucial $146Bench 108%, 44,787 samples	8x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	7x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	7x

RAM
M471B1G73DB0-YK0 2x8GBSamsungBench 53%, 30,591 samples	15x
M471B1G73DB0-YK0 4x8GBSamsungBench 54%, 2,172 samples	13x
HMT41GS6BFR8A-PB 4x8GBHynixBench 54%, 1,944 samples	8x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 63% - Good

Total price: $296

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16