Dell Precision T3600

Performance Results


Gaming 37% Jet ski	Desktop 73% Battleship	Workstation 35% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	50.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	38.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Dell Precision T3600
Motherboard	Dell Precision T3600 (all builds)
Memory	55.3 GB free of 64 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190625
Uptime	2.4 Days
Run Date	Sep 10 '21 at 19:18
Run Duration	278 Seconds
Run User	AUS-User
Background CPU	15%

PC Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-2665 0 1,061 User benchmarks, average bench 67% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	60.1% Good	Memory 83.9 1-Core 73 2-Core 146 61% 101 Pts	4-Core 197 8-Core 451 37% 324 Pts	64-Core 688 43% 688 Pts
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 60.1% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200 834,238 User benchmarks, average bench 49% Gigabyte(1458 3683) CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 456.71 Performing below potential (66^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	50.1% Above average	Lighting 61.6 Reflection 69 Parallax 61.2 50% 63.9 fps	MRender 67.8 Gravity 62 Splatting 55.2 50% 61.7 fps
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 50.1% Great: 54%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial MTFDBAK128MAG-1G1 128GB 1,036 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 32GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0005 SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 120 120 93 86 MB/s Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	38.3% Below average	Read 196 Write 122 Mixed 166 SusWrite 95.4 32% 145 MB/s	4K Read 21 4K Write 24.5 4K Mixed 12.4 61% 19.3 MB/s	DQ Read 184 DQ Write 114 DQ Mixed 82.4 79% 127 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 38.3% Great: 50%
LENSE20512GMSP34MEAT2TA 512GB 1,467 User benchmarks, average bench 129% 273GB free Firmware: 2.8.8341 SusWrite @10s intervals: 713 405 393 409 273 192 MB/s Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	133% Outstanding	Read 1,131 Write 1,099 Mixed 1,089 SusWrite 398 208% 929 MB/s	4K Read 30.9 4K Write 72.2 4K Mixed 46.8 145% 50 MB/s	DQ Read 475 DQ Write 344 DQ Mixed 329 268% 383 MB/s
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 133% Great: 177%
Sandisk SD7TB3Q-256G-1006 256GB 3,659 User benchmarks, average bench 81% 79GB free Firmware: 0306 SusWrite @10s intervals: 227 219 212 213 203 196 MB/s Performing below potential (5^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	59% Above average	Read 253 Write 242 Mixed 158 SusWrite 212 49% 216 MB/s	4K Read 20.5 4K Write 52.1 4K Mixed 26.9 93% 33.2 MB/s	DQ Read 170 DQ Write 145 DQ Mixed 107 94% 141 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 59% Great: 98%
Samsung MZ7PD256HCGM-000H7 256GB 5,922 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 77GB free Firmware: 6H6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 174 158 172 172 178 168 MB/s Performing below potential (10^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	62.1% Good	Read 255 Write 198 Mixed 222 SusWrite 170 48% 211 MB/s	4K Read 27.1 4K Write 52 4K Mixed 32.8 111% 37.3 MB/s	DQ Read 174 DQ Write 143 DQ Mixed 106 94% 141 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 62.1% Great: 108%
Crucial MTFDDAK256MAY-1AH12ABHA 256GB 1,792 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 49GB free Firmware: M5T4 SusWrite @10s intervals: 189 163 100 107 107 87 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	46.1% Average	Read 186 Write 193 Mixed 162 SusWrite 126 38% 167 MB/s	4K Read 20.3 4K Write 42 4K Mixed 22.5 82% 28.3 MB/s	DQ Read 149 DQ Write 110 DQ Mixed 115 90% 125 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 46.1% Great: 105%
Hitachi HUA721010KLA330 1TB 3,164 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 905GB free Firmware: GKAOA94A SusWrite @10s intervals: 53 52 53 53 53 53 MB/s Performing below expectations (40^th percentile)	36.1% Below average	Read 72.3 Write 80.8 Mixed 46.5 SusWrite 52.9 46% 63.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.9 171% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 36.1% Great: 47%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Toshiba-0098 9965516-031.A00LF 4x16GB 11 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 4 of 4 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	82.2% Excellent	MC Read 33.9 MC Write 33 MC Mixed 30.4 93% 32.4 GB/s	SC Read 12 SC Write 10.5 SC Mixed 9.4 30% 10.6 GB/s	Latency 73.6 54% 73.6 ns
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 82.2% Great: 83%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	8	6	60	21.7"	1280 720	GSM772D 32ML600

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Precision T3600 Builds (Compare 2,853 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 13%

Tree trunk

Desktop 67%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 12%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Dell Precision T3600

CPU
Xeon E5-1620 0Intel $345Bench 70%, 17,464 samples	1,062x
Xeon E5-1650 0Intel $230Bench 73%, 10,189 samples	446x
Xeon E5-1603 0IntelBench 60%, 3,589 samples	237x

GPU
Quadro 2000NvidiaBench 6%, 15,855 samples	162x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	138x
Quadro 4000NvidiaBench 7%, 8,609 samples	117x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	83x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	63x
870 EVO 1TBSamsung $98Bench 112%, 129,044 samples	48x

RAM
M393B5273DH0-CK0 4x4GBSamsung-00CEBench 85%, 1,049 samples	147x
HMT351R7CFR8C-PB 4x4GBHynix-00ADBench 83%, 808 samples	130x
HMT31GR7CFR4C-PB 4x8GBHynix-00ADBench 78%, 761 samples	74x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $373

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16