MSI A520M-A PRO (MS-7C96)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (83rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 17 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics4.36% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive98.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C96
MotherboardMSI A520M-A PRO (MS-7C96)  (all builds)
Memory12 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201230
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 10 '21 at 15:52
Run Duration199 Seconds
Run User AUT-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$83
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
89.1% Excellent
Memory 70.8
1-Core 147
2-Core 291
90% 170 Pts
4-Core 576
8-Core 874
90% 725 Pts
64-Core 1066
66% 1066 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 89.1%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Radeon HD 4670
Sapphire(174B E101) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.9001
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
4.36% Terrible
Lighting 5.2
Reflection 8.1
Parallax 3.7
4% 5.67 fps
MRender 5
Gravity 3.9
Splatting 7.3
5% 5.4 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.36%
Great: 5%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk SD7TN3Q-256G-1006 256GB
186GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X2180306
SusWrite @10s intervals: 362 377 382 382 383 381 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
98.5% Outstanding
Read 428
Write 379
Mixed 246
SusWrite 378
80% 358 MB/s
4K Read 34
4K Write 93.2
4K Mixed 39.3
151% 55.5 MB/s
DQ Read 274
DQ Write 266
DQ Mixed 142
142% 227 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 98.5%
Great: 96%
Crucial MX500 500GB-$46
466GB free
Firmware: M3CR033
SusWrite @10s intervals: 477 479 479 479 480 479 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
122% Outstanding
Read 508
Write 473
Mixed 424
SusWrite 479
106% 471 MB/s
4K Read 37.1
4K Write 104
4K Mixed 54.2
180% 65 MB/s
DQ Read 377
DQ Write 354
DQ Mixed 281
234% 337 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 122%
Great: 125%
Crucial MX500 500GB-$46
466GB free
Firmware: M3CR033
SusWrite @10s intervals: 479 478 479 480 479 479 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
123% Outstanding
Read 508
Write 471
Mixed 423
SusWrite 479
106% 470 MB/s
4K Read 37
4K Write 106
4K Mixed 55.5
183% 66 MB/s
DQ Read 377
DQ Write 357
DQ Mixed 278
233% 337 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 123%
Great: 125%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
926GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 185 186 186 187 187 186 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
110% Outstanding
Read 197
Write 179
Mixed 79.6
SusWrite 186
117% 161 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 0.9
193% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 110%
Great: 109%
USB DISK 2.0 16GB
14GB free, PID 5786, Q-cONNECT
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.5 5.9 5.8 5.9 5.9 6 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
6.13% Terrible
Read 22
Write 6
Mixed 5.5
SusWrite 5.8
11% 9.82 MB/s
4K Read 3.2
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.1
26% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.13%
Great: 7%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$45
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below potential (28th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
72.8% Very good
MC Read 30.2
MC Write 16.3
MC Mixed 31.8
75% 26.1 GB/s
SC Read 21
SC Write 16
SC Mixed 32
66% 23 GB/s
Latency 99.5
40% 99.5 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 72.8%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 30: 3R 4G 3B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
30% 13% 76 58 36 60 19.1" 1280 1024 HWP285A LA1951
Typical A520M-A PRO (MS-7C96) Builds (Compare 1,877 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard

Motherboard: MSI A520M-A PRO (MS-7C96)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 109% - Outstanding Total price: $118
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback