Asrock M3N78D

Performance Results


Gaming 9% Tree trunk	Desktop 48% Yacht	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	13.8% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (52%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asrock M3N78D (all builds)
Memory	12.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display	1366x768x4294967296 szín
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20110902
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 10 '21 at 10:21
Run Duration	196 Seconds
Run User	HUN-User
Background CPU	52%

PC Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Phenom II X4 B97 1,103 User benchmarks, average bench 55% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	42.9% Average	Memory 59.2 1-Core 42.6 2-Core 78.4 38% 60.1 Pts	4-Core 152 8-Core 179 22% 166 Pts	64-Core 182 11% 182 Pts
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 42.9% Great: 60%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GT 1030 185,384 User benchmarks, average bench 14% Gigabyte(1458 3767) 2GB CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 471.41 Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	13.8% Very poor	Lighting 17 Reflection 17.4 Parallax 18.5 14% 17.6 fps	MRender 14.2 Gravity 19.1 Splatting 17.1 14% 16.8 fps
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 13.8% Great: 15%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial BX500 240GB-$29 142,801 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 50GB free Firmware: M6CR013 SusWrite @10s intervals: 180 166 79 59 55 41 MB/s Performing below potential (29^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	40.8% Average	Read 232 Write 191 Mixed 197 SusWrite 96.7 40% 179 MB/s	4K Read 17.9 4K Write 31 4K Mixed 13.8 61% 20.9 MB/s	DQ Read 202 DQ Write 126 DQ Mixed 47.3 67% 125 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 40.8% Great: 92%
Samsung HD252HJ 250GB 8,167 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 101GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1AC01112 SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 59 59 71 72 68 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	29.9% Poor	Read 39.9 Write 43.6 Mixed 44.1 SusWrite 63.9 36% 47.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.4 94% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 29.9% Great: 58%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x4GB 106,178 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	27.5% Poor	MC Read 12.1 MC Write 7.4 MC Mixed 10.1 28% 9.87 GB/s	SC Read 5.6 SC Write 5.7 SC Mixed 7.7 18% 6.33 GB/s	Latency 130 31% 130 ns
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 27.5% Great: 61%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 27: 2R 4G 5B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
27%	17%	63	230	115	60	18.5"	1366 768	SAM0AE6 S19C150

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical M3N78D Builds (Compare 30 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 19%

Surfboard

Desktop 61%

Destroyer

Workstation 15%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock M3N78D

CPU
Phenom II X4 955AMD $83Bench 51%, 41,403 samples	6x
Phenom II X4 945AMDBench 51%, 12,746 samples	4x
Phenom II X4 925AMD $150Bench 51%, 5,211 samples	4x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	3x
GTX 650Nvidia $112Bench 8%, 69,673 samples	3x
GTX 660Nvidia $170Bench 20%, 123,956 samples	2x

SSD
Burst 120GBPatriotBench 66%, 15,567 samples	3x
BarraCuda 120 SSD ZA250CM10003 250GBSeagateBench 105%, 1,877 samples	2x
Burst Elite 120GBPatriotBench 67%, 1,599 samples	2x

RAM
4x4GBUnknownBench 43%, 106,178 samples	6x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	5x
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 91% - Outstanding

Total price: $142

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16