Gigabyte GA-H170N-WIFI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 76%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 65%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (81st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 19 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics85.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive46.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (60%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
SystemGigabyte H170N-WIFI
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H170N-WIFI  (all builds)
Memory27.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161111
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 10 '21 at 05:04
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 60%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (81st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700-$167
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
85.7% Excellent
Memory 88.3
1-Core 125
2-Core 242
85% 152 Pts
4-Core 447
8-Core 679
70% 563 Pts
64-Core 690
43% 690 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 85.7%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132
CLim: 2037 MHz, MLim: 2052 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 471.96
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
85.2% Excellent
Lighting 109
Reflection 108
Parallax 98.7
89% 105 fps
MRender 91.3
Gravity 99.1
Splatting 96.7
79% 95.7 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 85.2%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 EVO M.2 500GB
200GB free
Firmware: EMT21B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 459 474 463 468 468 466 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
131% Outstanding
Read 508
Write 491
Mixed 400
SusWrite 466
105% 466 MB/s
4K Read 47.1
4K Write 117
4K Mixed 62.5
213% 75.5 MB/s
DQ Read 384
DQ Write 346
DQ Mixed 364
273% 365 MB/s
Poor: 79%
This bench: 131%
Great: 131%
Samsung PM810 2.5" 7mm 128GB
61GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AXM08D1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 204 216 226 230 227 218 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
46.7% Average
Read 204
Write 214
Mixed 191
SusWrite 220
47% 207 MB/s
4K Read 14.2
4K Write 51.8
4K Mixed 16.5
70% 27.5 MB/s
DQ Read 118
DQ Write 57.9
DQ Mixed 24.1
35% 66.6 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 46.7%
Great: 50%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown MD4U1632160DCW 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (32nd percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
75.3% Very good
MC Read 28.6
MC Write 30.1
MC Mixed 21.6
76% 26.8 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 29.2
SC Mixed 22.8
64% 22.3 GB/s
Latency 69.2
58% 69.2 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 75.3%
Great: 97%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 9 7 30 36.1" 1280 720 TCL0000 43S435
Typical GA-H170N-WIFI-CF Builds (Compare 431 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 33%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H170N-WIFI - $120

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 83% - Excellent Total price: $445
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback