Gigabyte GA-H170N-WIFI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 75%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 65%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (81st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 19 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics84.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive48.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
SystemGigabyte H170N-WIFI
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H170N-WIFI  (all builds)
Memory27.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161111
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 10 '21 at 03:54
Run Duration157 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 11%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (81st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700-$167
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
86% Excellent
Memory 88.7
1-Core 123
2-Core 241
85% 151 Pts
4-Core 449
8-Core 702
71% 575 Pts
64-Core 690
43% 690 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 86%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132
CLim: 2037 MHz, MLim: 2052 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 471.96
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
84.3% Excellent
Lighting 108
Reflection 108
Parallax 99.5
88% 105 fps
MRender 91.2
Gravity 96.1
Splatting 95.4
77% 94.2 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 84.3%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 EVO M.2 500GB
195GB free
Firmware: EMT21B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 458 468 465 477 481 485 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
130% Outstanding
Read 507
Write 490
Mixed 396
SusWrite 472
105% 466 MB/s
4K Read 46.5
4K Write 117
4K Mixed 60.6
210% 74.6 MB/s
DQ Read 385
DQ Write 344
DQ Mixed 363
272% 364 MB/s
Poor: 79%
This bench: 130%
Great: 131%
Samsung PM810 2.5" 7mm 128GB
54GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AXM08D1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 195 218 227 223 233 221 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
48.9% Average
Read 228
Write 226
Mixed 172
SusWrite 219
48% 211 MB/s
4K Read 13.6
4K Write 58.7
4K Mixed 17.3
74% 29.9 MB/s
DQ Read 122
DQ Write 59.8
DQ Mixed 24.5
36% 68.7 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 48.9%
Great: 50%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown MD4U1632160DCW 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (30th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
73.8% Very good
MC Read 28.7
MC Write 29.3
MC Mixed 20.9
75% 26.3 GB/s
SC Read 16.3
SC Write 26.6
SC Mixed 21.3
61% 21.4 GB/s
Latency 68.8
58% 68.8 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 73.8%
Great: 97%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 47: 6R 3G 8B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
47% 17% 101 345 284 30 36.1" 1536 864 TCL0000 43S435
Typical GA-H170N-WIFI-CF Builds (Compare 431 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 33%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H170N-WIFI - $120

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 83% - Excellent Total price: $445
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback